Sensitive content
This site contains sensitive content that includes references to sexual violence.
This is, however, the first time the five countries have heard views directly from and held a roundtable with survivors and those with lived experience from across the five countries. This engagement forms part of the ongoing commitment made in the 2024 Five-Country Ministerial (FCM) communiqué to embed survivor expertise in shaping responses and to translate these commitments into concrete action.
The Brave Movement welcomes this focus and the recognition, in the 2025 FCM Communiqué, that survivor voices and expertise must continue to inform efforts to prevent and respond to child sexual abuse. This acknowledgment signals the governments' readiness to move from rhetoric to action, embedding survivor-led solutions in their policies.
In preparation for the Ministerial, I worked with members across the movement to advise and inform on how to undertake lived experience engagement, and as a movement, we welcome the prioritisation and commitment to best practice we witness by the UK government as hosts, and the other governments in attendance.
"At the Brave Movement, we know what's missing from policy and programs, the gaps we fell through, and the changes that will keep children safe."
I went to the Ministerial with three priority agendas we focus on at the movement, and shared them with a group of informed, engaged and attentive Ministers.
I spoke to the following themes in high-level terms, with more information set out below and shared through this blog to continue to continue these important conversations and equip others with the necessary knowledge.
The time has come for governments to stop playing catch-up when it comes to the proliferation of online sexual violence, and start leading the way, as many from the UK and beyond are starting to do. And for this work to succeed, governments must work with survivors.
"While technology is always outpacing legislation, it is not outpacing lived experiences."
Every day, technology companies launch new apps and innovations with brash disregard for child safety. I specifically spoke to three potential areas for action:
Cross-border enforcement with mandatory safety standards. Tech companies will change only when they risk losing market access. We discussed the importance of globally-aligned legislation requiring all digital products intended for children to implement 'safety by design' principles. This principle should be held to the same standard as child car seats - if safety isn't built in, they cannot be sold. This means mandating online service providers to report and remove all child sexual abuse material, with sanctions for non-compliance. Restricting market access to non-compliant products, as seen with age-verification requirements for adult sites, proves more effective than post-harm fines.
Scale prevention through sustained funding and public health approaches. The digital crisis affecting over 300 million children annually demands the same ambitious response. Governments must look to secure stable, sustained funding for frontline responders, social services, and trauma-informed prevention programs. This includes massive investment in awareness-raising campaigns and mandatory incorporation of online safety into national education curricula. Tech companies must enhance safety by allocating increased resources to Trust and Safety teams, while also supporting public-private partnerships for prevention education.
The numbers are staggering; over a billion people worldwide are survivors of child sexual violence. This has become a global public health crisis, and the world must respond with the same ambition as the AIDS awareness campaigns that broke taboos and saved lives through education. Prevention education must:
The cost of ignoring this crisis is catastrophic, often with far-reaching negative consequences like lifelong trauma, health consequences, economic instability, and strain on justice systems.
"Between lost productivity and increased public spending, childhood violence costs the world $7 trillion every year. That’s more than the GDPs of Japan, Germany, and India."
Prevention is not just moral; it is practical and an economic priority. The first visible signs that governments are serious will be:
Survivors need a permanent seat at the decision-making table. We, as the Brave Movement, call on governments to embed survivor councils into their structures, drawing on existing frameworks and proven models like in Germany. These councils provide continuous lived expertise, making laws more effective, prevention more targeted, and services more responsive.
We strongly welcome the 2025 FCM Communiqué which reaffirms a shared commitment to act. The Five Countries pledged to coordinate policy and operational efforts to address and work to prevent all forms of child sexual exploitation and abuse, pursue offenders, and ensure victims receive justice and support. They recognised the need for agile, cross-sector responses to new harms including AI-generated material, sexual extortion, livestreaming, and grooming and committed to continued engagement with survivors and advocates to inform these efforts.
FCM also acknowledged the role of law enforcement, border and intelligence agencies in pursuing perpetrators and safeguarding children, and stressed the importance of industry compliance with safety principles, innovation in child protection, and stronger international legal frameworks.
This is a powerful signal that governments are ready to move from commitment to action. If these plans are delivered through enforcement, survivor-centered policy design, and large-scale prevention, we can create a safer digital and offline world for every child.
"Our children deserve nothing less than a digital world built for their protection from the ground up."