CAPEC-158: Sniffing Network Traffic |
Description In this attack pattern, the adversary monitors network traffic between nodes of a public or multicast network in an attempt to capture sensitive information at the protocol level. Network sniffing applications can reveal TCP/IP, DNS, Ethernet, and other low-level network communication information. The adversary takes a passive role in this attack pattern and simply observes and analyzes the traffic. The adversary may precipitate or indirectly influence the content of the observed transaction, but is never the intended recipient of the target information. Typical Severity Prerequisites
| The target must be communicating on a network protocol visible by a network sniffing application. |
| The adversary must obtain a logical position on the network from intercepting target network traffic is possible. Depending on the network topology, traffic sniffing may be simple or challenging. If both the target sender and target recipient are members of a single subnet, the adversary must also be on that subnet in order to see their traffic communication. |
Skills Required
[Level: Low] Adversaries can obtain and set up open-source network sniffing tools easily. |
Resources Required
| A tool with the capability of presenting network communication traffic (e.g., Wireshark, tcpdump, Cain and Abel, etc.). |
Consequences This table specifies different individual consequences associated with the attack pattern. The Scope identifies the security property that is violated, while the Impact describes the negative technical impact that arises if an adversary succeeds in their attack. The Likelihood provides information about how likely the specific consequence is expected to be seen relative to the other consequences in the list. For example, there may be high likelihood that a pattern will be used to achieve a certain impact, but a low likelihood that it will be exploited to achieve a different impact.| Scope | Impact | Likelihood |
|---|
Confidentiality | Read Data | |
Mitigations
| Obfuscate network traffic through encryption to prevent its readability by network sniffers. |
| Employ appropriate levels of segmentation to your network in accordance with best practices. |
Taxonomy Mappings CAPEC mappings to ATT&CK techniques leverage an inheritance model to streamline and minimize direct CAPEC/ATT&CK mappings. Inheritance of a mapping is indicated by text stating that the parent CAPEC has relevant ATT&CK mappings. Note that the ATT&CK Enterprise Framework does not use an inheritance model as part of the mapping to CAPEC.Relevant to the ATT&CK taxonomy mapping | Entry ID | Entry Name |
|---|
| 1040 | Network Sniffing | | 1111 | Multi-Factor Authentication Interception |
Content History | Submissions |
|---|
| Submission Date | Submitter | Organization |
|---|
| 2014-06-23 (Version 2.6) | CAPEC Content Team | The MITRE Corporation | | | Modifications |
|---|
| Modification Date | Modifier | Organization |
|---|
| 2015-11-09 (Version 2.7) | CAPEC Content Team | The MITRE Corporation | | Updated References | | 2015-12-07 (Version 2.8) | CAPEC Content Team | The MITRE Corporation | | Updated Description Summary, Related_Attack_Patterns | | 2017-08-04 (Version 2.11) | CAPEC Content Team | The MITRE Corporation | | Updated Resources_Required | | 2018-07-31 (Version 2.12) | CAPEC Content Team | The MITRE Corporation | | Updated Activation_Zone, Attack_Motivation-Consequences, Attack_Prerequisites, Attacker_Skills_or_Knowledge_Required, Description Summary, Injection_Vector, Payload, Payload_Activation_Impact, Resources_Required, Solutions_and_Mitigations | | 2022-09-29 (Version 3.8) | CAPEC Content Team | The MITRE Corporation | | Updated Taxonomy_Mappings |
More information is available — Please select a different filter.
|