Sunsetting Projects (classic) breaks existing functionality #127081
Replies: 4 comments 14 replies
-
|
@evi-liu, that's great news, I'm looking forward to hearing more updates! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
-
|
@evi-liu, is there any ETA for when the GraphQL API support for the issue history will be available? The forced projects v2 migration is now one month away, and we'd need some time to implement the changes before our customers' existing functionality breaks. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
If immediate resolution isn’t feasible, consider creating a custom solution that uses GitHub’s API to replicate the issue history functionality. For example, you can use the GitHub GraphQL API to query and aggregate issue data from the classic projects into a separate database or system. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Select Topic Area
Bug
Feature Area
Projects
Body
Now that GitHub is sunsetting the legacy Projects (https://github.blog/changelog/2024-05-23-sunset-notice-projects-classic/), I would like to point out that this move will break existing functionality that we have implemented for several of our customers. The problem is that there is no API-level feature parity, as the ProjectsV2 lacks the issue history as pointed out in these forum discussions:
https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/39668
https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/5859
We are using GraphQL as per your recommendation at the time we started working with your API. But it's still not providing the essential functionality for ProjectsV2 that our customers have been using for years with the Projects (classic).
Is it too much to ask you to implement the issue history for the new Projects before the forced migration on August 23?
Guidelines
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions