Announcing: Slice by 🍕 , Updates to issue forms, Group menu, plus bug fixes and improvements 💫 #63381
Replies: 2 comments 5 replies
-
|
I'm really liking We have a number of different services in our project, issues pertaining to which get a |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This is great - but could it also be possible to link issue form fields to custom fields in the project so they are set on the form too? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.


Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Today's Issues & Projects update brings you the brand new slice by, updates to issue forms, and a group menu across layouts!
🍕 Slice by
You can now slice by field values in your project views! Select a
Slice byfield from the view configuration menu to pull the field values into a panel on the left, and click through the values in the list to adjust the items shown in the view on the right.Configuring a
Slice byfield allows you to quickly toggle through and review your project items, saving you additional filters and views to quickly understand the state and details of your project. While you can slice by your issue and project fields, some helpful slice by views include:Labelsto group items by repository labelsAssigneesto see who is working on what📋 Updates to issue forms
You can now configure custom issue forms to automatically add an issue to a project as well as set defaults for drop downs by adding a YAML form definition file to the
/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATEfolder in your repository.Group menu for item and group actions
We've added a group menu to quickly take action on items in a group or on the group itself. Click
...from the group header on your tables, boards, or roadmaps to archive or delete all items in a group, edit the group details directly, hide the group from the view, or delete it from your project.✨ Bug fixes and improvements
Make a copyfrom the project...menu@nextfilter qualifier for iteration fields was referencing the incorrect iterationField sumdecimal precisionWhat do you think of these updates? Have questions, comments, or excitement, share it below ⬇️ .
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions