Timeline for answer to What’s Next for Curation by Thom A
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| yesterday | comment | added | user1937198 | "This already exists; we have reopen votes. That users don't edit their question, after it is closed, to explain why a question doesn't answer theirs, is the author's fault, not the community's." Its also arguably the platforms fault (ie something that @Hoid should be looking at), The platform needs really clear messaging that when something is closed, the expectation is someone should edit it. Giving people the option to go to staging ground for help, adding notifications, and in other ways clearing up the UX here would be really helpful. | |
| 2 days ago | comment | added | Dalija Prasnikar Mod | Ability to migrate older posts that don't belong here would be great. This would have to be coordinated with the receiving site, but we have plenty of otherwise good questions that simply don't belong here. Giving them proper home with redirection would be a win for everyone. | |
| 2 days ago | comment | added | M-- | @Dharman lesser of two evils. | |
| 2 days ago | history | edited | M-- | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Active reading.
|
| 2 days ago | comment | added | Thom A Mod | I don't disagree, the damage has been done, @Dharman . But Stack Inc seems to use their existence as ammunition against curation, so I do think we need to do something. | |
| 2 days ago | comment | added | Dharman Mod | "We can't, however, migrate older posts". Allowing migration of older posts is not such a good idea. It could cause havoc. | |
| 2 days ago | history | edited | Thom AMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 28 characters in body
|
| 2 days ago | history | answered | Thom AMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |