Gdoc/Admin

Popular pages

Research and data to make progress against the world’s largest problems.

13,896 charts across 123 topicsAll free: open access and open source

Our Mission

What do we need to know to make the world a better place?

To make progress against the pressing problems the world faces, we need to be informed by the best research and data.

Our World in Data makes this knowledge accessible and understandable, to empower those working to build a better world.

Read about our mission

We are a non-profit — all our work is free to use and open source. Consider supporting us if you find our work valuable.

Donate to support us
As seen on
Logos of the publications that have used our content. From left to right: Science, Nature, PNAS, BBC, Financial Times, The New York Times, The Guardian, The Atlantic, and The Washington Post

Data Insights

Bite-sized insights on how the world is changing, published every few days.

See all Data Insights
A bar chart illustrates access to clean cooking fuels in various Asian countries in 2023. The title highlights that Bangladesh significantly lags behind its neighbors. Each bar represents the share of the population with access to clean cooking fuels, including natural gas, electricity, and clean cookstoves. 

China has the highest percentage at 89%, followed by Thailand at 87%, and India at 77%. Pakistan shows 55%, while Myanmar has 54%, and Nepal has 43%. Afghanistan's percentage is 39%, Sri Lanka is at 35%, and Bangladesh is notably the lowest at 28%, marked in a darker color for emphasis. 

A note explains that the reliance on non-clean cooking fuels, such as biomass, can lead to pollution harmful to health. The data source is the World Health Organization and the Global Health Observatory, with a reference year of 2025.

Access to clean cooking fuels in Bangladesh is far lower than in its Asian neighbors

Electricity access in Bangladesh has transformed over my lifetime: from around 15% of the population 30 years ago, to 99% today.

But progress on clean cooking fuels has lagged far behind. Fewer than 30% of households cook with gas, electricity, or improved stoves; most still rely on wood, crop waste, or straw. The chart shows that clean fuel usage is well below the levels reached by its Asian neighbors.

The costs are huge. Using biomass for cooking damages forests and harms health because people breathe in smoke and particulates. In Bangladesh, deaths from indoor air pollution are higher than the average in low-income countries, even though those countries usually have worse overall health. Indoor air pollution is close to being the country’s largest risk factor for early death.

Why has progress been so slow? The main barrier is economic. Bangladesh produces very little liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), relying instead on volatile imports. Its lack of domestic distribution networks also pushes prices, making clean cooking fuels expensive for consumers. Some of Bangladesh’s neighbors — like India — have given subsidies to help households switch; Bangladesh has not, making clean cooking fuels less affordable.

Cultural factors also matter. Biomass is often seen as “free” and convenient, and families are used to traditional cookstoves and the flavors they generate. They might be unaware of how damaging this pollution is to their health and skeptical of the damage that alternatives such as LPG could do.

Read my colleague Max Roser’s article — “The world’s energy problem” — for a global perspective on this issue

Continue reading
The image displays a line graph illustrating the growth of nuclear electricity generation in France from 1970 to 2024, measured in terawatt-hours (TWh). The vertical axis, ranging from 0 to 500 TWh, indicates the amount of electricity generated, while the horizontal axis represents the years. 

Starting from near zero in 1970, the curve rises steeply, particularly in the 1980s, reflecting the rapid expansion of nuclear power. Key annotations highlight that the first commercial reactor was opened in 1964, and by 1980, nuclear generation was at 60 TWh. By 1990, this figure exceeded 300 TWh. 

The graph shows a general upward trend until 1999, with no new plants added until the anticipated opening of the Flamanville plant in 2024. After peaking, the curve indicates a decline in generation towards the end of the period shown. 

The bottom of the graph provides its data source, citing the Energy Institute and the Statistical Review of World Energy, published in 2025. The image is credited under the Creative Commons BY license.

France opened a flurry of nuclear power plants in the 1980s and 1990s, giving it low-carbon electricity ever since

At the turn of the millennium, France had one of the lowest-carbon electricity grids in Europe (and the world). While countries like the UK and Germany emitted well over 500 grams of CO₂ per kilowatt-hour of electricity, France emitted just 80 grams — six times less. This was mostly thanks to nuclear power.

In the 1980s and 1990s, France rapidly expanded its power grid, and almost all of this growth came from new nuclear plants. The chart shows this: in the 1980s alone, nuclear power grew from 60 to over 300 terawatt-hours.

By 2000, nuclear power supplied almost 80% of the country’s electricity, making it much cleaner than its neighbors, mostly relying on coal and gas.

France still has one of the cleanest grids in Europe, although it has added very little nuclear power in the 21st century. It has opened just one plant in the last 25 years, in Flamanville, following long delays and cost overruns.

In the last decade, solar and wind power have grown the most.

See what countries produce nuclear energy, and how their generation has changed over time

Continue reading
A line graph titled "There are just two Northern White rhinos left in the world; both are female" outlines the decline in the estimated population of Northern White rhinos from 1960 to 2021. The vertical axis represents the estimated number of rhinos, ranging from zero to 2,500, while the horizontal axis spans the years from 1960 to 2021.

In 1960, the estimated population was approximately 2,230 rhinos. The line sharply declines, indicating a significant drop, with the population reaching about 350 rhinos by 1981. The downward trend continues, with a note indicating that by 2018, only two females named Najin and Fatu remain, following the death of the last male, Sudan.

Data sources are listed at the bottom as African and Asian Rhino Specialist Groups (AfRSG), with a Creative Commons attribution notation (CC BY).

Only two Northern White rhinos remain, and both are female

The Northern White rhino is on the brink of extinction. In the chart, you can see the collapse of this beautiful animal's population as a result of poaching, habitat loss, and conflict.

Now, only two individuals are left — Najin and her daughter, Fatu. Without males, the subspecies is “functionally extinct” and cannot rebuild its population naturally.

Scientists, though, offer some hope of bringing the rhino back through assisted reproduction. Eggs from Najin and Fatu have been fertilized with preserved sperm from dead male rhinos to produce viable embryos. Since neither Najin nor Fatu can carry a pregnancy, the plan is to use a female Southern White rhino — the closest subspecies — as a surrogate, to carry the embryo through to birth.

In 2023, a surrogate called Curra became pregnant, showing that the method works. Sadly, she died of a bacterial infection during pregnancy.

Scientists plan to try again and are also exploring other breakthrough reproduction treatments to save the Northern White rhino before it’s lost forever.

Read my article on why large mammals are so threatened with extinction

Continue reading
The image presents a bar chart comparing death rates per 100,000 people across various income levels of countries for the year 2021. It highlights two categories: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and infectious, maternal, and neonatal causes, alongside injuries. 

The income groups are categorized as low-income, lower-middle income, upper-middle income, and high-income. 

- Low-income countries have death rates of 633 from NCDs, 560 from infectious diseases, and 1,279 from injuries.
- Lower-middle income countries show 662 from NCDs, 366 from infectious diseases, and 1,092 from injuries.
- Upper-middle income countries report 534 from NCDs, 155 from infectious diseases, and 699 from injuries.
- High-income countries exhibit significantly lower rates: 378 from NCDs, 74 from infectious diseases, and 487 from injuries.

A note at the bottom clarifies that lower death rates from infectious diseases in high-income countries are not countered by higher rates from NCDs, as these rates are also lower than in poorer countries. 

The data source is the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), Global Burden of Disease, 2024, and it acknowledges that the metric is age-standardized for comparability.

Richer countries don’t just avoid infectious disease — they also have lower rates of chronic disease deaths

One of humanity’s biggest victories has been the fight against infectious diseases. This battle has led to plummeting rates of child and maternal mortality and dramatically increased life expectancy.

However, there are still large differences in infectious disease rates between different parts of the world. As we might expect, deaths are much less common in high-income countries where almost everyone can access clean water, sanitation, and medication.

One common misconception is that this prosperity has come at the cost of an increase in death rates from chronic diseases, such as heart disease and cancers (collectively called “non-communicable diseases”). But this is not the case. As you can see in the chart, death rates from these diseases are also lower in richer countries. It’s not the case that we’ve simply substituted one health problem for another.

That means that the risk of someone of a given age dying from any cause each year tends to decrease as countries get richer.

Explore more of our data on causes of death across the world

Continue reading
The image presents a bar graph illustrating the global population distribution based on the legality of same-sex marriage. The vertical axis represents the number of people, ranging from 0 to 8 billion, while the horizontal axis covers the years from 2000 to 2025. 

The graph shows two distinct color-coded segments: a large purple area indicating that 6.7 billion people live in countries where same-sex marriage is illegal, and a smaller green area representing 1.5 billion people who reside in countries where same-sex marriage is legal. The graph emphasizes the disparity in populations affected by these legal statuses over time.

At the bottom of the image, the data sources are listed as follows: HYDE (2023), Gapminder (2022), and UN WPP (2024). The image is published with a Creative Commons attribution.

1.5 billion people now live in countries where same-sex marriage is legal — but that’s only one in five worldwide

The first nationwide law allowing same-sex couples to marry was passed in the Netherlands in 2001. Amsterdam’s mayor, Job Cohen, officiated the first couples. Twenty-five years on, these rights to same-sex marriage now cover 1.5 billion people worldwide.

These people live in 39 countries with marriage equality, mainly across Western Europe and the Americas.

This change in marriage laws has made a huge difference to the lives of many. But they are still in the minority globally. Four in five people still live in countries where same-sex couples are not equal under the law.

Explore which countries have legalized same-sex marriage

Continue reading
This is a line graph depicting the decline in agricultural employment across various Asian countries over a 30-year period, from 1991 to 2019. The title reads "Employment in agriculture has dropped a lot across Asia in the last 30 years," emphasizing the significant reduction in this sector. 

There are several colored lines representing different countries, each showing a downward trend from 1991 to 2019: 
- India decreased from 63% to 43%.
- Bangladesh went from 70% to 38%.
- Vietnam dropped from 71% to 37%.
- Thailand fell from 60% to 31%.
- Indonesia declined from 56% to 29%.
- China saw a reduction from 60% to 25%.
- The Philippines went from 45% to 23%.

The graph is accompanied by a data source note indicating that the information is derived from the International Labor Organization via the World Bank. The chart has a Creative Commons BY attribution license from Our World in Data.

Fewer people work in farming in Asia’s largest countries

Over the last three decades, employment has changed dramatically across Asia.

In the early 1990s, almost two-thirds of the labor force in South Asia was employed in agriculture, and more than half in East Asia. Today, this is just 40% in the former, and one-quarter in the latter.

The chart shows the change across several countries in these regions. The share has fallen in all of them, but some stand out as having particularly dramatic transitions away from farming.

In Bangladesh and Vietnam, rates have fallen from around 70% to 38%. In China, they have dropped from 60% to 25%. In India, things have moved more slowly.

This matters for people still working in agriculture and those who have moved to jobs in other sectors. Productivity gains — which can allow family members and former workers to move away from the farm — mean that the financial returns per farm worker have increased over this time. Those who have moved to jobs in industry and services often see an increase in their wages. The result is that mean incomes have increased across these countries.

Read our data insight on this transition in today’s rich countries

Continue reading
The image presents a horizontal bar chart illustrating the importance of having honest elections as expressed by respondents in various countries in 2022. Each bar represents a country and is color-coded to show the share of responses categorized as "Important" in blue, "Not important" in red, "Don't know" in gray, and "No answer" in black. 

The countries listed, from top to bottom based on their importance ratings, include Indonesia, South Korea, the United Kingdom, Australia, India, Iran, Nigeria, Turkey, the United States, Brazil, Japan, Kenya, Egypt, Mexico, Russia, and Czechia. The majority of respondents from many countries indicate that having honest elections is important, with a significant number displaying uncertainty or deeming it not important.

Data source: Integrated Values Surveys (2024). Important responses include those categorized as "very important" and "rather important," while unimportant responses include "not very important" and "not at all important." The image is licensed under Creative Commons BY.

Honest elections matter to people everywhere

Honest elections matter because they give people a say in how their country is run. They help ensure that governments reflect the people's will and that policies respond to real needs.

It’s sometimes assumed that support for democracy and fair elections is limited to particular regions or cultures. However, data from the Integrated Values Surveys, which asks people across many countries how much honest elections matter to them, shows otherwise.

Across all the countries surveyed, large majorities said honest elections are important in their lives. Nearly everyone said so in Indonesia, South Korea, and the UK. Even in countries where experts judge elections as unfree or unfair — like Iran, Egypt, or Russia — around 80% to 90% still said they matter.

In some contexts, people may feel pressure to answer this question in a certain way, either downplaying or overstating the importance of elections. Still, the consistency of results across such different countries suggests the demand is real.

Explore more data on free and fair elections for all countries

Continue reading

Get Data Insights delivered to your inbox

Receive an email from us when we publish a Data Insight (every few days).

By subscribing you are agreeing to the terms of our privacy policy.

Explore our data

Featured data from our collection of 13,896 interactive charts.

See all our data

What share of children die before their fifth birthday?

What could be more tragic than the death of a young child? Child mortality, the death of children under the age of five, is still extremely common in our world today.

The historical data makes clear that it doesn’t have to be this way: it is possible for societies to protect their children and reduce child mortality to very low rates. For child mortality to reach low levels, many things have to go right at the same time: good healthcare, good nutrition, clean water and sanitation, maternal health, and high living standards. We can, therefore, think of child mortality as a proxy indicator of a country’s living conditions.

The chart shows our long-run data on child mortality, which allows you to see how child mortality has changed in countries around the world.

Explore and learn more about this data
Explore and learn more about this data

Share of population living in extreme povertyWorld Bank

Life expectancyLong-run estimates collated from multiple sources by Our World in Data

CO₂ emissions per capitaLong-run estimates from the Global Carbon Budget

GDP per capitaLong-run estimates from the Maddison Project Database

Share of people who are undernourishedUN FAO

Literacy rateLong-run estimates collated from multiple sources by Our World in Data

Share of the population with access to electricityWorld Bank

Data explorers

See all our Data Explorers

Interactive visualization tools to explore a wide range of related indicators.

Subscribe to our newsletters

All our topics

All our data, research, and writing — topic by topic.

Population and Demographic Change

Health

Energy and Environment

Food and Agriculture

Poverty and Economic Development

Education and Knowledge

Innovation and Technological Change

Living Conditions, Community and Wellbeing

Human Rights and Democracy

Violence and War