Skip to main content
arXiv is now an independent nonprofit! Learn more
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Computer Science > Software Engineering

arXiv:2602.11988 (cs)
[Submitted on 12 Feb 2026 (v1), last revised 23 Jun 2026 (this version, v2)]

Title:Evaluating AGENTS.md: Are Repository-Level Context Files Helpful for Coding Agents?

Authors:Thibaud Gloaguen, Niels Mündler, Mark Müller, Veselin Raychev, Martin Vechev
View a PDF of the paper titled Evaluating AGENTS.md: Are Repository-Level Context Files Helpful for Coding Agents?, by Thibaud Gloaguen and 4 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:A widespread practice in software development is to tailor coding agents to repositories using context files, such as this http URL. Although this practice is strongly encouraged by agent developers, there is currently no rigorous investigation into whether such context files are actually effective for real-world tasks. In this work, we study this question and evaluate coding agents' task completion performance in two complementary settings: established SWE-bench tasks from popular repositories, with LLM-generated context files, and a novel collection of issues from repositories containing developer-committed context files. Surprisingly, we find that providing context files does not generally improve task success rates, while increasing inference cost by over 20% on average. This observation holds across different LLMs, coding agents, and for both LLM-generated and developer-committed context files. Specifically, we find that while instructions in the context files are well followed by coding agents, repository overviews, although popular and recommended by model providers, are not helpful. We conclude that while context files are useful for specifying non-standard coding practices, any attempts to improve performance should be rigorously evaluated before deployment.
Subjects: Software Engineering (cs.SE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2602.11988 [cs.SE]
  (or arXiv:2602.11988v2 [cs.SE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.11988
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Thibaud Gloaguen [view email]
[v1] Thu, 12 Feb 2026 14:15:22 UTC (2,264 KB)
[v2] Tue, 23 Jun 2026 20:26:50 UTC (2,891 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Evaluating AGENTS.md: Are Repository-Level Context Files Helpful for Coding Agents?, by Thibaud Gloaguen and 4 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
license icon view license

Current browse context:

cs.SE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2026-02
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Schmidt Sciences