Skip to main content
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Computer Science > Robotics

arXiv:2607.00673 (cs)
[Submitted on 1 Jul 2026]

Title:Path Planning in Physically Viable World Models

Authors:Su Ann Low, Cheng-Hsi Hsiao, Xingjian Li, Adam J. Thorpe, Ufuk Topcu, Krishna Kumar
View a PDF of the paper titled Path Planning in Physically Viable World Models, by Su Ann Low and 5 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Robots deployed in unstructured outdoor environments often plan from scene reconstructions collected before deployment because operators cannot remap large or remote sites before every mission. As a result, robots must make long-horizon planning decisions using stale maps that assume the terrain remains unchanged, even though physical changes to the environment may render previously feasible routes unsafe or unreachable at execution time. We present a physically viable world model for evaluating what-if queries for robot navigation under future terrain change. The system augments reconstructed 3D Gaussian splat scenes with physics-based simulation to generate physically modified versions of the same environment without recollecting sensor data or rebuilding the map. We then implement a terrain-aware planner that accounts for physical events, obstacles, and deformations that are simulated by the world model. This allows robots and human operators to evaluate whether planned routes remain feasible before committing to a planned route, particularly in constrained environments where retreat or recovery may become impossible once conditions change. We evaluate the system on a real outdoor field site in Central Texas using simulated flooding across multiple severity levels. We measure route and mission feasibility as terrain conditions deteriorate under physically simulated interventions. Our results show that physically viable world models expose long-horizon route failures and rerouting behavior that are not apparent when planning only on the original reconstructed environment, allowing robots to evaluate how future terrain changes may affect route feasibility before deployment.
Comments: 18 pages, 7 figures, submitted to CORL
Subjects: Robotics (cs.RO)
ACM classes: I.2.9; I.2.8
Cite as: arXiv:2607.00673 [cs.RO]
  (or arXiv:2607.00673v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.00673
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Su Ann Low [view email]
[v1] Wed, 1 Jul 2026 09:19:29 UTC (7,157 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Path Planning in Physically Viable World Models, by Su Ann Low and 5 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
view license

Current browse context:

cs.RO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2026-07
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Simons Foundation International Schmidt Sciences