Skip to main content
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2609.04667 (cs)
[Submitted on 4 Sep 2026]

Title:ERPBench: Evaluating LLM Agents for Enterprise Decision-Making Across Competitive Market Ecologies

Authors:Xinran Zhang, Pengrui Lu, Lyumanshan Ye, Pengfei Liu
View a PDF of the paper titled ERPBench: Evaluating LLM Agents for Enterprise Decision-Making Across Competitive Market Ecologies, by Xinran Zhang and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly proposed for enterprise workflows, yet existing evaluations rarely test whether business-decision conclusions transfer across competitive market ecologies. We introduce ERPBench, an execution-instrumented benchmark for enterprise decision agents in a six-round Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) simulation with coupled pricing, production, procurement, inventory, finance, and shared-market competition. ERPBench evaluates the same 100 fixed problems in two matched competitive market ecologies: Solo, where each evaluated LLM agent competes against fixed rule-based opponents, and Arena, where six evaluated LLM agents compete in a shared market. Across six model families, this yields 1,200 model-level trajectories spanning 7,200 decision rounds. Under the observed service configuration, the leading model differs between ecologies: DeepSeek leads in Solo (252.29M mean valuation; mean rank 1.67), whereas Gemini leads in Arena (263.95M; 1.76). The two ecologies identify the same task-level winner on only 21 of 100 problems, and Gemini's bottom-rank rate falls from 22 % to 0 % in Arena. ERPBench supports paired evaluation of whether enterprise-agent rankings transfer across competitive market ecologies, supplemented by aggregate execution-intervention analysis. Code and benchmark resources are available in our this https URL.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.04667 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2609.04667v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.04667
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Xinran Zhang [view email]
[v1] Fri, 4 Sep 2026 02:58:29 UTC (2,504 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled ERPBench: Evaluating LLM Agents for Enterprise Decision-Making Across Competitive Market Ecologies, by Xinran Zhang and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2026-09
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Simons Foundation International Schmidt Sciences