User talk:AnshuDV

Hello, AnshuDV, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:AnshuDV/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 21:26, 11 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on User:AnshuDV/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 21:26, 11 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 22:25, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Cinema of India, you may be blocked from editing. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:42, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  RegentsPark (comment) 15:17, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AnshuDV (block log · active blocks · global blocks · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · creation log · change block settings · unblock · checkuser (log) · SI)

---

Request reason:

I'm just updating information, kindly please unblock meAnshuDV (talk) 04:35, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

That's what a lot of people tell us. We don't see it that benignly. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:19, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AnshuDV (block log · active blocks · global blocks · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · creation log · change block settings · unblock · checkuser (log) · SI)

---

Request reason:

i promise..it won't happen next time... please forgive me or unblock me... AnshuDV (talk) 03:08, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Please tell us what you did wrong and what you will do differently, along with describing your connection to the subjects of your edits. 331dot (talk) 08:14, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AnshuDV (block log · active blocks · global blocks · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · creation log · change block settings · unblock · checkuser (log) · SI)

---

Request reason:

I apologize for posting a promotional link on Wikipedia. I now understand that it goes against Wikipedia's guidelines for neutrality and verifiability. In the future, I will refrain from making such edits and instead focus on contributing valuable, unbiased information. My connection to the subjects of my edits will be based on a commitment to providing accurate and impartial content that benefits Wikipedia's community of readers. AnshuDV (talk) 08:36, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You seem to think the only problem was an inappropriate link. That's not the case. Yamla (talk) 10:25, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AnshuDV (block log · active blocks · global blocks · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · creation log · change block settings · unblock · checkuser (log) · SI)

---

Request reason:

okay i already apologized now you tell me .. what i have to do for unblock AnshuDV (talk) 13:33, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

In order to be unblocked, you will need to describe:

1. The behaviour that caused the block,
2. Why that behaviour was wrong,
3. What you will do differently if unblocked to avoid this mistake again.

Please see WP:GAB for more information. Z1720 (talk) 01:18, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AnshuDV (block log · active blocks · global blocks · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · creation log · change block settings · unblock · checkuser (log) · SI)

---

Request reason:

I apologize for posting a promotional link on Wikipedia. I now understand that it goes against Wikipedia's guidelines for neutrality and verifiability. In the future, I will refrain from making such edits and instead focus on contributing valuable, unbiased information. My connection to the subjects of my edits will be based on a commitment to providing accurate and impartial content that benefits Wikipedia's community of readers. Please Please unblock me.. i understand AnshuDV (talk) 23:54, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. I do not think you understand why the policies we have are important. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:34, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

please unblock me now.. AnshuDV (talk) 16:00, 13 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please read and understand the decline reason given above. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:11, 13 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Dear Sir,

I am writing to request you to please remove my block... I have read the “guide to appealing blocks” as suggested. I now understand that my earlier requests were not proper because I did not address the main issues...

After checking the warnings from September 2023, I now clearly understand that I was blockedd for adding promotional and advertising content, especially on the “Cinema of India” page..

I understand that my account looked like it was being used only for promotion. I am sorry for ignoring the earlier warning. I now understand that Wikipedia is meant to be an encyclopedia, not a place for promotion or advertising.

I promise that I will never use Wikipedia to promote or any other commercial interest again. I will strictly follow guidelines. AnshuDV (talk) 16:25, 13 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

No admin will see your request unless you use the unblock template. I am no longer an admin, but I would guess you would still be declined with your request being so seemingly AI-generated. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:32, 13 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

No, This is not ai generated.. AnshuDV (talk) 17:40, 13 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

AnshuDV (block log · active blocks · global blocks · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · creation log · change block settings · unblock · checkuser (log) · SI)

---

Request reason:

I'm request you to please remove my block... I have read the “guide to appealing blocks” as suggested. I now understand that my earlier requests were not proper because I did not address the main issues... After checking the warnings from September 2023, I now clearly understand that I was blockedd for adding promotional and advertising content, especially on the “Cinema of India” page.. I understand that my account looked like it was being used only for promotion. I am sorry for ignoring the earlier warning. I now understand that Wikipedia is meant to be an encyclopedia, not a place for promotion or advertising. I promise that I will never use Wikipedia to promote or any other commercial interest again. I will strictly follow guidelines. AnshuDV (talk) 17:39, 13 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Accept reason:

You are unblocked. You have agreed to avoid anything that could be seen as promotional. PhilKnight (talk) 18:04, 14 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

You are misunderstanding what I am asking when I asked about "connection"- you seem to think I am saying "committment". By connection I mean how are you related to the subject you edited about? 331dot (talk) 21:37, 13 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for explaining. By “connection,” I understand that you are asking about my relationship with the topics I edited. I want to be honest and say that I work in the media field. In the past, I made the mistake of adding content related to my own interests and professional work, which I now understand was a conflict of interest. I am sorry for not sharing this earlier.

If my block is removed, I promise that I will not edit any pages where I have a personal... AnshuDV (talk) 23:49, 13 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

What would you be interested in editing if unblocked? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:02, 14 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

I now understand that my past mistakes happened because I did not fully understand Wikipedia’s purpose. If I am unblocked, I will not editing anything related to my professional work to avoid further issues. Since I regularly follow tech and sports news, I can help by updating small details or fixing outdated information in those areas. AnshuDV (talk) 08:40, 14 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

@RegentsPark: - how do you feel about a possible unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 13:01, 14 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

A lot of what AnshuDV has written above does seem to be AI generated but I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. AnshuDV, if you're unblocked, please avoid anything that looks even remotely promotional. RegentsPark (comment) 16:03, 14 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you.. @RegentsPark: and @PhilKnight:. I appreciate the benefit of the doubt. My earlier message was not AI-generated.. I understand the concern and promise to stay away from anything that could be seen as promotional.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnshuDV (talk • contribs)

You haven’t created your User Page yet Charles 091 (talk) 01:19, 15 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, AnshuDV, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

• Policy on neutral point of view
• Guideline on spam
• Guideline on external links
• Guideline on conflict of interest
• FAQ for article subjects

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and how to develop articles
• Help pages
• Tutorials
• Article wizard for creating new articles
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Charles 091 (talk) 05:22, 15 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, @Charles 091: thank you for the welcome and for pointing this out. I was recently unblocked and I am trying my best to follow the rules. Could you please let me know which recent specific edit or contribution of mine looked like advertising? I want to understand my mistake so I can fix it and make sure it doesn't happen again. AnshuDV (talk) 05:44, 15 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

There no article for Little Alchemy 2

Link:Draft:Little Alchemy 2 Charles 091 (talk) 08:13, 26 February 2026 (UTC)Reply