Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 December 1

File:L(eonard). C(harles). Bowkett.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DynamoDegsy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Invalid license. Image is not PD as the work was created after 1930. J Mo 101 (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:STANAG 2116, Ed. 6.pdf (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JurKo22 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The user tried his best, but I doubt that he's right about a need and a possibility to use this file. See also ru:Википедия:Форум/Авторское_право#Оформление_лицензии_для_официальных_документов_НАТО. Lvova Anastasiya (talk) 14:15, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miss Moneypenny by Caroline Bliss.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Insomniacpuppy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Miss Moneypenny by Samantha Bond.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Insomniacpuppy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Casinobouchet.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by MachoCarioca (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Images of other actresses portraying Miss Moneypenny may not contextually signify much about this fictional character. George Ho (talk) 17:52, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. They may be very contextually significant to someone who has only seen a film with a particular actress portraying the character.

 ⚙️ WidgetKid 🙈🙉🙊  14:27, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

very contextually significant to someone who has only seen a film. "Contextual significance" (WP:NFC#CS) doesn't limit to such demographic but applies to everyone else, especially those who've yet to see the films. Well, it says that screenshots should significantly increase readers' understanding of the fictional character herself enough to make omitting such screenshots detrimental to understanding this character.

As I see, this character has been just a secretary to "M". I'm afraid I have found images of portrayers not much of improvement but rather.... decorative perhaps. How do the screenshots (of actresses portraying the same role) improve your understanding of the character... besides what she looks like differently? George Ho (talk) 17:55, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:56, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Batch 1871.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CLWE (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails WP:NFCC8 for context and understanding. The picture as it stands is a non-sequitur, lacking even a caption. For those who don't know, the character Father Ted Crilly has told his housekeeper Mrs Doyle that he is about to move to America. She then appears for a second like an innocent little girl asking if she can come too. This scene isn't even mentioned in the plot. It could theoretically be noted if there were sources for the production that described the camera trick to make her short, whether the actress liked the costume, but we'd have to cross that bridge first. Additionally there is another still in the article already (that one's purpose is pretty tenuous, but at least the event is mentioned as a plot point). Unknown Temptation (talk) 15:53, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]