Skip to content

Handle revision fetch failures in streamAskQuestion#4204

Open
conico974 wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
conico/rnd-10594
Open

Handle revision fetch failures in streamAskQuestion#4204
conico974 wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
conico/rnd-10594

Conversation

@conico974
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@conico974 conico974 commented Apr 21, 2026

Ensure that failures in fetching revisions do not disrupt the entire answer process.
If an error is emitted, we display an error message at the end of the message instead of replacing the entire already displayed response with an error message.

@changeset-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

changeset-bot Bot commented Apr 21, 2026

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: b9c7334

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@argos-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

argos-ci Bot commented Apr 21, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Argos notifications ↗︎

Build Status Details Updated (UTC)
customers-v2-cloudflare (Inspect) ✅ No changes detected - Apr 22, 2026, 12:39 PM
customers-v2-vercel (Inspect) ✅ No changes detected - Apr 22, 2026, 12:39 PM
v2-cloudflare (Inspect) 👍 Changes approved 9 changed Apr 22, 2026, 12:46 PM
v2-vercel (Inspect) 👍 Changes approved 9 changed Apr 22, 2026, 12:44 PM
@utkuufuk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Nitpick: how about a warning log for easier debugging?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@SamyPesse SamyPesse left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It should not be handled; it should be fixed in gbx

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

3 participants