Skip to content

Conversation

@Malmahrouqi3
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Fixed print statements to be more clear that the test failed due to mainly grind time not reaching the threshold.

expected output at failure.
image

@Malmahrouqi3 Malmahrouqi3 requested a review from a team June 20, 2025 19:02
@Malmahrouqi3
Copy link
Contributor Author

Malmahrouqi3 commented Jun 20, 2025

All failure modes: zero, negative, null, below thresholds.

 Comparing Benchmarks: Speedups from master/bench-cpu.yaml to pr/bench-cpu.yaml are displayed below. Thus, numbers > 1 represent increases in performance.
 Warning: Exec time speedup for simulation is less than 0.9 - Case: 5eq_rk3_weno3_hllc
 Error: Benchmarking failed since grind time speedup for simulation below acceptable threshold (<0.95) - Case: 5eq_rk3_weno3_hllc
 Warning: Exec time speedup for post_process is less than 0.9 - Case: 5eq_rk3_weno3_hllc
 Warning: Exec time speedup for pre_process is less than 0.9 - Case: hypo_hll
 Warning: Exec time speedup for simulation is less than 0.9 - Case: hypo_hll
 Warning: Exec time speedup for post_process is less than 0.9 - Case: hypo_hll
 Warning: Exec time speedup for pre_process is less than 0.9 - Case: viscous_weno5_sgb_acoustic
 Warning: Exec time speedup for simulation is less than 0.9 - Case: viscous_weno5_sgb_acoustic
 Error: Benchmarking failed since grind time speedup for simulation below acceptable threshold (<0.95) - Case: viscous_weno5_sgb_acoustic
 Warning: Exec time speedup for post_process is less than 0.9 - Case: viscous_weno5_sgb_acoustic
 Warning: Exec time speedup for pre_process is less than 0.9 - Case: ibm
 Warning: Exec time speedup for post_process is less than 0.9 - Case: ibm

  Case                         Pre Process                  Simulation   Post Process
 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
  5eq_rk3_weno3_hllc            Exec: 0.95   Exec: -0.00 & Grind: 0.00     Exec: 0.84
  hypo_hll                      Exec: 0.75                  Exec: 0.84     Exec: 0.21
  viscous_weno5_sgb_acoustic    Exec: 0.86    Exec: 0.00 & Grind: 0.00     Exec: 0.77
  ibm                           Exec: 0.68                         N/A     Exec: 0.63



Error: Benchmarking failed

Terminated


sbryngelson
sbryngelson previously approved these changes Jun 20, 2025
@sbryngelson
Copy link
Member

will merge once the benchmark CI passes

@Malmahrouqi3
Copy link
Contributor Author

sounds good

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 20, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 45.78%. Comparing base (59d0c09) to head (170cbe6).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #895   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   45.78%   45.78%           
=======================================
  Files          68       68           
  Lines       18658    18658           
  Branches     2251     2251           
=======================================
  Hits         8543     8543           
  Misses       8757     8757           
  Partials     1358     1358           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
@Malmahrouqi3
Copy link
Contributor Author

Benchmark / Phoenix gpu failed to build master oddly.

@Malmahrouqi3
Copy link
Contributor Author

Genuinely baffling, I can't see what could have triggered the failure. I will submit a manual benchmark job on Phoenix right now and share the results tonight.

@sbryngelson
Copy link
Member

Phoenix is having filesystem migration issues.

@sbryngelson sbryngelson self-requested a review June 21, 2025 01:16
@sbryngelson sbryngelson self-requested a review June 21, 2025 14:31
@sbryngelson sbryngelson merged commit 9c224ba into MFlowCode:master Jun 21, 2025
28 of 29 checks passed
prathi-wind pushed a commit to prathi-wind/MFC-prathi that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2025
Co-authored-by: Spencer Bryngelson <shb@gatech.edu>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

2 participants