Skip to content

Conversation

@CamosITSolutions
Copy link

@CamosITSolutions CamosITSolutions commented Nov 1, 2025

Description

Due to Bitnami changes in their repository, only the :latest tag is available within the bitnami public catalogue, with this project using on version tag 8.0.
Without this change, the following error occurs when running pnpm docker:db:up: "Error response from daemon: failed to resolve reference "docker.io/bitnami/valkey:8.0": docker.io/bitnami/valkey:8.0: not found"

Source: https://hub.docker.com/r/bitnami/valkey#%EF%B8%8F-important-notice-upcoming-changes-to-the-bitnami-catalog --"
Starting August 28th, over two weeks, all existing container images, including older or versioned tags (e.g., 2.50.0, 10.6), will be migrated from the public catalog (docker.io/bitnami) to the “Bitnami Legacy” repository (docker.io/bitnamilegacy), where they will no longer receive updates.
"


Type of Change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • 📝 Documentation update

Areas Affected

Please check all that apply:

  • Email Integration (Gmail, IMAP, etc.)
  • User Interface/Experience
  • Authentication/Authorization
  • Data Storage/Management
  • API Endpoints
  • Documentation
  • Testing Infrastructure
  • Development Workflow
  • Deployment/Infrastructure

Testing Done

Describe the tests you've done:
This was changed in my local system, and after running 'pnpm docker:db:up' the errors dissapeared. This is a simple fix where the repository previously referenced (bitnami) no longer contains tagged versions.

  • Unit tests added/updated
  • Integration tests added/updated
  • Manual testing performed
  • Cross-browser testing (if UI changes)
  • Mobile responsiveness verified (if UI changes)

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
  • My code follows the project's style guidelines
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in complex areas
  • I have updated the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix/feature works
  • All tests pass locally
  • Any dependent changes are merged and published

Additional Notes

Add any other context about the pull request here.

Screenshots/Recordings

Add screenshots or recordings here if applicable.


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the project's license.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated Valkey service configuration to use the legacy Valkey image for deployments (deployment manifests adjusted)
Due to Bitnami Valkey packages becoming hardened, only the :latest tag is available within the bitnami public catalogue. Without this change, the following error occurs: 
"Error response from daemon: failed to resolve reference "docker.io/bitnami/valkey:8.0": docker.io/bitnami/valkey:8.0: not found"

Source: https://hub.docker.com/r/bitnami/valkey#%EF%B8%8F-important-notice-upcoming-changes-to-the-bitnami-catalog
------------------
Starting August 28th, over two weeks, all existing container images, including older or versioned tags (e.g., 2.50.0, 10.6), will be migrated from the public catalog (docker.io/bitnami) to the “Bitnami Legacy” repository (docker.io/bitnamilegacy), where they will no longer receive updates.
-----------------
Updated docker-compose.prod.yaml to bitnamilegacy
Updated bitnami to bitnamilegacy
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 1, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@CamosITSolutions has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 37 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 64c5480 and 8805d63.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docker-compose.db.yaml (1 hunks)
  • docker-compose.prod.yaml (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

Docker Compose files updated to change the Valkey service image reference from docker.io/bitnami/valkey:8.0 to docker.io/bitnamilegacy/valkey:8.0 in both development and production manifests.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Valkey image update
docker-compose.db.yaml, docker-compose.prod.yaml
Updated Valkey image from docker.io/bitnami/valkey:8.0 to docker.io/bitnamilegacy/valkey:8.0

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

  • Verify the bitnamilegacy/valkey:8.0 image exists and is compatible with current configurations.
  • Confirm no implicit expectations (volumes, paths, healthchecks) rely on the previous image's behavior.

Poem

🐰 I hopped through YAML fields today,
Swapped a name and bounded away,
Bitnamilegacy now in sight,
A tiny change — a rabbit's delight,
thump 🌱

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The PR title "Update Bitnami to Bitnamilegacy for valkey package" directly and accurately describes the primary change in the changeset. Both modified files (docker-compose.db.yaml and docker-compose.prod.yaml) update the valkey service Docker image from the bitnami registry to the bitnamilegacy registry, and the title captures this core change precisely. The title is concise, specific, and free of vague terminology, making it clear to reviewers that this PR addresses a repository migration issue affecting the valkey Docker image reference.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 64c5480 and b9537ce.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docker-compose.db.yaml (1 hunks)
  • docker-compose.prod.yaml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docker-compose.prod.yaml (1)

71-71: Consistent with db.yaml updates; same migration concern applies to production.

The production compose file correctly mirrors the bitnamilegacy migration from docker-compose.db.yaml. Healthcheck configuration (lines 77–81) is robust and well-tuned.

However, the same breaking-change risk noted for the dev environment applies here: production valkey-data volumes may become inaccessible or experience data loss after this upgrade.

Please ensure that production deployment documentation or runbooks include guidance for users upgrading existing Valkey instances with persistent data.

Also applies to: 76-76

@CamosITSolutions
Copy link
Author

@coderabbitai generate docstrings

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 1, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Initiated docstring generation; will generate only if new commits exist.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 1, 2025

Caution

Docstrings generation - FAILED

No docstrings were generated.

@CamosITSolutions
Copy link
Author

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 1, 2025

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

CodeRabbit commands

These commands are invoked using PR/Issue comments.

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai evaluate custom pre-merge check --instructions <custom-checks-instructions> --name <custom-checks-title> [--mode <error|warning>] to validate the custom pre-merge checks instructions. Defaults to error when --mode is omitted.
    • @coderabbitai ignore pre-merge checks to override pre-merge checks and get an approval on PR.
    • @coderabbitai run pre-merge checks to run pre-merge checks on the pull request.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve to resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore or @coderabbit ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit configuration file (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, support, documentation and community

  • Visit our status page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.
  • Visit our documentation site for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord community to connect with other users and get help from the community.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
@CamosITSolutions
Copy link
Author

@coderabbitai run pre-merge checks

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 1, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Running Pre-merge checks. Results will be posted in the summary comment once complete.

@CamosITSolutions
Copy link
Author

@coderabbitai full review

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 1, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

1 participant