Summary
The Command Execution feature of Filebrowser only allows the execution of shell command which have been predefined on a user-specific allowlist. The implementation of this allowlist is erroneous, allowing a user to execute additional commands not permitted.
Impact
A user can execute more shell commands than they are authorized for. The concrete impact of this vulnerability depends on the commands configured, and the binaries installed on the server or in the container image. Due to the missing separation of scopes on the OS-level, this could give an attacker access to all files managed the application, including the File Browser database.
Vulnerability Description
For a user to make use of the command execution feature, two things need to happen in advance:
- An administrator needs to grant that account the
Execute commands permission
- The command to be executed needs to be listed in the
Commands input field (also done by an administrator)
If a user tries to execute a different command, it gets rejected by the application.
The allowlist verification of a command happens in the function CanExecute in the file users/users.go:
// CanExecute checks if an user can execute a specific command.
func (u *User) CanExecute(command string) bool {
if !u.Perm.Execute {
return false
}
for _, cmd := range u.Commands {
if regexp.MustCompile(cmd).MatchString(command) {
return true
}
}
return false
}
This check employs a regular expression which does not test if the command issued (command) is identical to a configured one (cmd, part of the array u.Commands) but rather only if the issued command contains an allowed one.
This has the consequence, that, e.g., if you are only granted access to the ls command, you will also be allowed to execute lsof and lsusb.
As a prerequisite, an attacker needs an account with the Execute Commands permission and some permitted commands.
Proof of Concept
Grant a user the Execute commands permission and allow them to use only ls in the Commands field.

Afterwards, login as that user, open a command execution window and execute lsof and lsusb.

Recommended Countermeasures
The CanExecute function in the Filebrowser source code should be fixed to only allow exact matches of the command specified instead of doing partial matching.
The correctness of this fix should be extensively tested in the application's automated test suite.
Timeline
2025-03-25 Identified the vulnerability in version 2.32.0
2025-04-11 Contacted the project
2025-04-18 Vulnerability disclosed to the project
2025-06-25 Uploaded advisories to the project's GitHub repository
2025-06-25 CVE ID assigned by GitHub
2025-06-26 Fix released in version 2.33.10
References
Credits
References
Summary
The Command Execution feature of Filebrowser only allows the execution of shell command which have been predefined on a user-specific allowlist. The implementation of this allowlist is erroneous, allowing a user to execute additional commands not permitted.
Impact
A user can execute more shell commands than they are authorized for. The concrete impact of this vulnerability depends on the commands configured, and the binaries installed on the server or in the container image. Due to the missing separation of scopes on the OS-level, this could give an attacker access to all files managed the application, including the File Browser database.
Vulnerability Description
For a user to make use of the command execution feature, two things need to happen in advance:
Execute commandspermissionCommandsinput field (also done by an administrator)If a user tries to execute a different command, it gets rejected by the application.
The allowlist verification of a command happens in the function
CanExecutein the fileusers/users.go:This check employs a regular expression which does not test if the command issued (
command) is identical to a configured one (cmd, part of the arrayu.Commands) but rather only if the issued command contains an allowed one.This has the consequence, that, e.g., if you are only granted access to the
lscommand, you will also be allowed to executelsofandlsusb.As a prerequisite, an attacker needs an account with the
Execute Commandspermission and some permitted commands.Proof of Concept
Grant a user the
Execute commandspermission and allow them to use onlylsin theCommandsfield.Afterwards, login as that user, open a command execution window and execute
lsofandlsusb.Recommended Countermeasures
The
CanExecutefunction in the Filebrowser source code should be fixed to only allow exact matches of the command specified instead of doing partial matching.The correctness of this fix should be extensively tested in the application's automated test suite.
Timeline
2025-03-25Identified the vulnerability in version 2.32.02025-04-11Contacted the project2025-04-18Vulnerability disclosed to the project2025-06-25Uploaded advisories to the project's GitHub repository2025-06-25CVE ID assigned by GitHub2025-06-26Fix released in version 2.33.10References
Credits
References