fix(i18n): review Traditional Chinese count labels

[nrps9909]

SUMMARY

Review and confirm 23 fuzzy Traditional Chinese (zh_TW) messages whose existing matches were objectively incorrect, and align one adjacent confirmed column-count label.

This focuses on dynamic count, selection, and elapsed-time UI text:

• restores dropped %s placeholders in imported, metric, selection, and time labels;
• corrects mismatched units and fixed values such as 10 seconds, 12 hours, 24 hours, and percentile presets;
• distinguishes Taiwan Traditional Chinese column/row terminology (欄位 / 列);
• removes the fuzzy flag only after checking each message against its frontend call site.

Open-PR overlap check: draft #38266 also mechanically refreshes this catalog as part of a repository-wide Babel update. Six target msgids occur there as generated fuzzy guesses; its substantive database forbidden-access translation is unrelated and is not touched by this PR.

This contribution was prepared with Codex assistance. I reviewed the source call sites, translations, placeholders, diff, and validation results, and I will respond to review feedback.

BEFORE/AFTER SCREENSHOTS OR ANIMATED GIF

No screenshot: this is a locale-catalog-only change across several dynamic UI states. Representative corrections include:

• 數據集已導入 → 已匯入 %s
• 月 → %s 分鐘前
• 自定義列 → 已選取 %s／%s 個欄位
• 9/91 百分位 → 10/90 百分位數 and 5/95 百分位數

TESTING INSTRUCTIONS

• msgfmt --check --check-format -o /dev/null superset/translations/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/messages.po
• Targeted Babel compile for all 24 changed messages: 24/24 translated, no placeholder errors
• python scripts/translations/check_translation_regression.py --compare <baseline>: no translation regressions; zh_TW confirmed translations +23, fuzzy translations -23
• pre-commit run: passed for the staged catalog
• Verified all 24 changed entries against their source call sites and confirmed zero remaining fuzzy flags in the reviewed set

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

• Has associated issue:
• Required feature flags:
• Changes UI
• Includes DB Migration (follow approval process in SIP-59)
  • Migration is atomic, supports rollback & is backwards-compatible
  • Confirm DB migration upgrade and downgrade tested
  • Runtime estimates and downtime expectations provided
• Introduces new feature or API
• Removes existing feature or API

[bito-code-review]

Code Review Agent Run #c68f09

Actionable Suggestions - 0

Review Details

• Files reviewed - 1 · Commit Range: da729fe..da729fe

  • superset/translations/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/messages.po
• Files skipped - 0
• Tools

  • Whispers (Secret Scanner) - ✔︎ Successful
  • Detect-secrets (Secret Scanner) - ✔︎ Successful

---

Bito Usage Guide

Commands

Type the following command in the pull request comment and save the comment.

• /review - Manually triggers a full AI review.

• /pause - Pauses automatic reviews on this pull request.

• /resume - Resumes automatic reviews.

• /resolve - Marks all Bito-posted review comments as resolved.

• /abort - Cancels all in-progress reviews.

Refer to the documentation for additional commands.

Configuration

This repository uses Superset You can customize the agent settings here or contact your Bito workspace admin at evan@preset.io.

Documentation & Help

• Customize agent settings
• Review rules
• General documentation
• FAQ

AI Code Review powered by

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 66.50%. Comparing base (83c6ea4) to head (60e67b3).
⚠️ Report is 35 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #43063      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   66.73%   66.50%   -0.24%     
==========================================
  Files        2876     2870       -6     
  Lines      164226   163429     -797     
  Branches    37890    37553     -337     
==========================================
- Hits       109601   108686     -915     
- Misses      52466    52585     +119     
+ Partials     2159     2158       -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
hive	38.11% <ø> (ø)
mysql	57.77% <ø> (ø)
postgres	57.80% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
presto	40.04% <ø> (ø)
python	59.19% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
sqlite	57.44% <ø> (ø)
unit	100.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.