Add vibecheck to Command Line tools

[rshdhere]

We want to ensure high quality of the packages. Make sure that you've checked the boxes below before sending a pull request.

• I have read the Contribution Guidelines
• I have read the Maintainers Note
• I have read the Quality Standards

Not every repository (project) will require every option, but most projects should. Check the Contribution Guidelines for details.

• The repo documentation has a pkg.go.dev link.
• The repo documentation has a coverage service link.
• The repo documentation has a goreportcard link.
• The repo has a version-numbered release and a go.mod file.
• The repo has a continuous integration process that automatically runs tests that must pass before new pull requests are merged.
• Continuous integration is used to attempt to catch issues prior to releasing this package to end-users.

Please provide some links to your package to ease the review

• forge link (github.com, gitlab.com, etc): https://github.com/rshdhere/vibecheck
• pkg.go.dev: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/rshdhere/vibecheck
• goreportcard.com: https://goreportcard.com/report/github.com/rshdhere/vibecheck
• coverage service link (codecov, coveralls, etc.): https://app.codecov.io/gh/rshdhere/vibecheck

Pull Request content

• The package has been added to the list in alphabetical order.
• The package has an appropriate description with correct grammar.
• As far as I know, the package has not been listed here before.

Category quality

Note that new categories can be added only when there are 3 packages or more.

Packages added a long time ago might not meet the current guidelines anymore. It would be very helpful if you could check 3-5 packages above and below your submission to ensure that they also still meet the Quality Standards.

Please delete one of the following lines:

• The packages around my addition still meet the Quality Standards.
• I removed the following packages around my addition: (please give a short reason for each removal)

Thanks for your PR, you're awesome! 😎

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added documentation for "vibecheck", a cross-platform CLI that automatically generates Git commit messages from code changes and how to use it.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Added a new README entry for the CLI tool "vibecheck" under Command Line > Standard CLI; no code, API, or control-flow changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation Update README.md	Added a new CLI library entry "vibecheck" under Command Line > Standard CLI describing it as a cross-platform CLI that generates Git commit messages from code changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

• Files to spot-check: README.md

Poem

🐇 A nibble, a note, a new tool to check,
vibecheck hops in to tidy your deck,
Commits sing themselves in a neat little stream,
A rabbit-approved, automated dream. 🥕

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately summarizes the main change: adding vibecheck to the Command Line tools section of the README.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b0902f6 and 79af74f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• README.md

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)

• GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
• GitHub Check: quality

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

README.md (1)

455-455: Tighten description and end with a period (Awesome list style).

Keep it neutral and concise, and add the required trailing period.

Apply this diff:

- - [vibecheck](https://github.com/rshdhere/vibecheck) - A lightweight, cross-platform command line AI-tool that automatically generates meaningful and consistent Git Commit Messages by analyzing your code changes
+ - [vibecheck](https://github.com/rshdhere/vibecheck) - Cross-platform CLI that generates Git commit messages from code changes.

Optional: Given its Git focus, consider placing it under the "Version Control" section instead of "Standard CLI."

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2698e59 and b0902f6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (3)

README.md

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

README.md: When modifying the Awesome list, keep categories with at least three entries
Descriptions in the Awesome list must end with a period
Avoid promotional copy; keep descriptions concise and neutral in the Awesome list
Do not remove existing list content unless removal is requested and justified

Files:

• README.md

**/*.md

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

Keep documentation in English

Files:

• README.md

{README.md,COVERAGE.md}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

Align rendered documentation (README.md, COVERAGE.md, etc.) with behavior changes in main.go or helper packages

Files:

• README.md

🧠 Learnings (2)

📓 Common learnings

Learnt from: elymanuba
Repo: avelino/awesome-go PR: 5762
File: README.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-14T23:46:18.545Z
Learning: When reviewing contributions to the awesome-go repository, maintain a relaxed and less pedantic approach. Users may find overly strict feedback about formatting, alphabetical ordering, or description tone to be unnecessary. Focus on major issues rather than minor stylistic preferences.

📚 Learning: 2025-10-08T00:38:13.132Z

Learnt from: CR
Repo: avelino/awesome-go PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-10-08T00:38:13.132Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.go : Use standard formatting (gofmt) and idiomatic Go style

Applied to files:

• README.md

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)

• GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
• GitHub Check: quality

[github-actions]

Automated Quality Checks (from CONTRIBUTING minimum standards)

• Repo: OK
• pkg.go.dev: OK
• goreportcard: OK (grade unknown)
• coverage: missing

These checks are a best-effort automation and do not replace human review.

[rshdhere]

Forge link: https://github.com/rshdhere/vibecheck
pkg.go.dev: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/rshdhere/vibecheck
goreportcard.com: https://goreportcard.com/report/github.com/rshdhere/vibecheck
Coverage: https://app.codecov.io/gh/rshdhere/vibecheck | 82.96%

[rshdhere]

a humble ping for the maintainers to check the PR as it's been 02 weeks now
@avelino

[Jason-123-cyber]

We want to ensure high quality of the packages. Make sure that you've checked the boxes below before sending a pull request.

• I have read the Contribution Guidelines
• I have read the Maintainers Note
• I have read the Quality Standards

Not every repository (project) will require every option, but most projects should. Check the Contribution Guidelines for details.

• The repo documentation has a pkg.go.dev link.
• The repo documentation has a coverage service link.
• The repo documentation has a goreportcard link.
• The repo has a version-numbered release and a go.mod file.
• The repo has a continuous integration process that automatically runs tests that must pass before new pull requests are merged.
• Continuous integration is used to attempt to catch issues prior to releasing this package to end-users.

Please provide some links to your package to ease the review

• forge link (github.com, gitlab.com, etc): https://github.com/rshdhere/vibecheck
• pkg.go.dev: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/rshdhere/vibecheck
• goreportcard.com: https://goreportcard.com/report/github.com/rshdhere/vibecheck
• coverage service link (codecov, coveralls, etc.): https://app.codecov.io/gh/rshdhere/vibecheck

Pull Request content

• The package has been added to the list in alphabetical order.
• The package has an appropriate description with correct grammar.
• As far as I know, the package has not been listed here before.

Category quality

Note that new categories can be added only when there are 3 packages or more.

Packages added a long time ago might not meet the current guidelines anymore. It would be very helpful if you could check 3-5 packages above and below your submission to ensure that they also still meet the Quality Standards.

Please delete one of the following lines:

• The packages around my addition still meet the Quality Standards.
• I removed the following packages around my addition: (please give a short reason for each removal)

Thanks for your PR, you're awesome! 😎

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation

  • Added documentation for "vibecheck", a cross-platform CLI that automatically generates Git commit messages from code changes and how to use it.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.