Bounds-check after arithmetic is complete #4
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
double_to_size can return std::numeric_limits<size_t>max(), so we cannot add 1 to the return value of double_to_size. That addition should be done while still working with a double, as can be seen being done on line 850 of this file. This was uncovered by Coverity, and addresses Coverity issues CID13443 and CID12664
danieljames
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2014
Bounds-check after arithmetic is complete
danieljames
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 22, 2015
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
double_to_size can return std::numeric_limits<size_t>max(), so we cannot add 1 to the return value of double_to_size. That addition should be done while still working with a double, as can be seen being done on line 850 of this file.
This was uncovered by Coverity, and addresses Coverity issues CID13443 and CID12664