ST_EXTENT aggregation (#104659)#117451
Merged
GalLalouche merged 58 commits intoelastic:mainfrom Dec 13, 2024
Merged
Conversation
…ticsearch/xpack/esql/planner/AggregateMapper.java
craigtaverner
requested changes
Dec 12, 2024
...rc/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/expression/function/aggregate/SpatialStExtent.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...rc/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/expression/function/aggregate/SpatialStExtent.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...csearch/compute/aggregation/spatial/SpatialStExtentCartesianPointSourceValuesAggregator.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...a/org/elasticsearch/compute/aggregation/spatial/SpatialStExtentCartesianShapeAggregator.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...elasticsearch/compute/aggregation/spatial/SpatialStExtentGeoPointSourceValuesAggregator.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...st/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/expression/function/aggregate/SpatialStExtentTests.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...st/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/expression/function/aggregate/SpatialStExtentTests.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
x-pack/plugin/esql/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/expression/RectangleMatcher.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ql/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/expression/WellKnownBinaryBytesRefMatcher.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| * Also note that the type converting function is removed when it does not actually convert the type, | ||
| * ensuring that ReferenceAttributes are not created for the same field, and the optimization can still work. | ||
| */ | ||
| public void testSpatialTypesAndStatsExtentUseDocValues() { |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Perhaps a test that has both centroid and extent aggregations?
…rch into feature/st_extent
craigtaverner
approved these changes
Dec 12, 2024
Contributor
craigtaverner
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. I think some PhysicalPlanOptimizerTests over shapes would be good, but that can be done in the next PR where we do shape optimization.
Collaborator
💔 Backport failed
You can use sqren/backport to manually backport by running |
GalLalouche
added a commit
to GalLalouche/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2024
This PR adds support for ST_EXTENT_AGG aggregation, i.e., computing a bounding box over a set of points/shapes (Cartesian or geo). Note the difference between this aggregation and the already implemented scalar function ST_EXTENT. This isn't a very efficient implementation, and future PRs will attempt to read these extents directly from the doc values. We currently always use longitude wrapping, i.e., we may wrap around the dateline for a smaller bounding box. Future PRs will let the user control this behavior. Fixes elastic#104659.
GalLalouche
added a commit
to GalLalouche/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2024
This PR adds support for ST_EXTENT_AGG aggregation, i.e., computing a bounding box over a set of points/shapes (Cartesian or geo). Note the difference between this aggregation and the already implemented scalar function ST_EXTENT. This isn't a very efficient implementation, and future PRs will attempt to read these extents directly from the doc values. We currently always use longitude wrapping, i.e., we may wrap around the dateline for a smaller bounding box. Future PRs will let the user control this behavior. Fixes elastic#104659.
GalLalouche
added a commit
to GalLalouche/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2024
This PR adds support for ST_EXTENT_AGG aggregation, i.e., computing a bounding box over a set of points/shapes (Cartesian or geo). Note the difference between this aggregation and the already implemented scalar function ST_EXTENT. This isn't a very efficient implementation, and future PRs will attempt to read these extents directly from the doc values. We currently always use longitude wrapping, i.e., we may wrap around the dateline for a smaller bounding box. Future PRs will let the user control this behavior. Fixes elastic#104659.
GalLalouche
added a commit
to GalLalouche/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2024
This PR adds support for ST_EXTENT_AGG aggregation, i.e., computing a bounding box over a set of points/shapes (Cartesian or geo). Note the difference between this aggregation and the already implemented scalar function ST_EXTENT. This isn't a very efficient implementation, and future PRs will attempt to read these extents directly from the doc values. We currently always use longitude wrapping, i.e., we may wrap around the dateline for a smaller bounding box. Future PRs will let the user control this behavior. Fixes elastic#104659.
elasticsearchmachine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2024
This PR adds support for ST_EXTENT_AGG aggregation, i.e., computing a bounding box over a set of points/shapes (Cartesian or geo). Note the difference between this aggregation and the already implemented scalar function ST_EXTENT. This isn't a very efficient implementation, and future PRs will attempt to read these extents directly from the doc values. We currently always use longitude wrapping, i.e., we may wrap around the dateline for a smaller bounding box. Future PRs will let the user control this behavior. Fixes #104659.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Support
ST_EXTENTaggregation (Issue #104659)This PR adds support for
ST_EXTENTaggregation, i.e., computing a bounding box over a set of points/shapes (Cartesian or geo). (Note the difference between this aggregation and the already implemented *scalar *functionST_EXTENT).Fixes #104659