You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When I view a raster as a local .tif file vs. the same raster loaded into postgres with the same Singleband pseudocolor rendering and Statistics extent set to "Updated Canvas", I get very different results. Both visually with the range of the colour band applied, and numerically with the min / max values.
What is the bug or the crash?
When I view a raster as a local .tif file vs. the same raster loaded into postgres with the same Singleband pseudocolor rendering and Statistics extent set to "Updated Canvas", I get very different results. Both visually with the range of the colour band applied, and numerically with the min / max values.
Recording.2026-02-12.193056.mp4
Steps to reproduce the issue
Download this clipped EMODnet Bathymetry raster:
D4_2024_clipped.tif
Load the raster into a postgres database (with PostGIS raster installed)
raster2pgsql -t auto -q -c -F -I -C -M -Y "C:\GIS\Data\EMODnet\D4_2024_clipped.tif" test.bathy | psql -U postgres -d gisdata -h localhost -p 5432Repeat steps as in above video
Versions
Supported QGIS version
New profile
Additional context
No response