Skip to content

Conversation

@erimatnor
Copy link
Member

When using the chunks view, it makes sense to show the time range as timestamp for UUIDv7-partitioned tables. Previously, the range was a unix timestamp integer.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 16, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.53%. Comparing base (67ec098) to head (93c381b).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8786      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.40%   82.53%   +1.12%     
==========================================
  Files         248      248              
  Lines       47749    47923     +174     
  Branches    12138    12224      +86     
==========================================
+ Hits        38871    39551     +680     
+ Misses       3953     3520     -433     
+ Partials     4925     4852      -73     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
@erimatnor erimatnor changed the title Show chunks view range as timestamps for UUIDv7 Oct 16, 2025
@erimatnor erimatnor force-pushed the uuidv7-chunks-view branch 2 times, most recently from 90be217 to f62fea4 Compare October 20, 2025 10:00
@erimatnor erimatnor marked this pull request as ready for review October 20, 2025 11:35
@github-actions
Copy link

@akuzm, @fabriziomello: please review this pull request.

Powered by pull-review

@erimatnor erimatnor requested review from melihmutlu and pnthao and removed request for akuzm October 20, 2025 11:36
When using the chunks view, it makes sense to show the time range as
timestamp for UUIDv7-partitioned tables. Previously, the range was a
unix timestamp integer.
@akuzm
Copy link
Member

akuzm commented Nov 3, 2025

Do we query this view in any tests?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

3 participants