Sdk builders extended with addProcessorFirst methods

[onurkybsi]

Resolves the issue #6599.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.62%. Comparing base (04677f9) to head (e719247).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #7243      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     89.60%   89.62%   +0.01%     
- Complexity     6859     6862       +3     
============================================
  Files           780      780              
  Lines         20728    20735       +7     
  Branches       2018     2018              
============================================
+ Hits          18574    18584      +10     
+ Misses         1514     1512       -2     
+ Partials        640      639       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[jack-berg]

Approving, but should also add the equivalent method to tracing

[jack-berg]

This name follows the naming convention of Deque#addFirst, albeit "LogRecordProcessor" inserted between "add" and "First".

While it initially seems like a verbose name, I think its probably the best we can do to balance consistency with the existing "addLogRecordProcessor" and the precedent in java with Deque#addFirst.