I dont know about musk, and trump, but I could see a spat with carr, and musk
that section 230 will eventually cause a problem between the two, also go bluesky!
If the law requires that it will only go into effect, if there is more than 1/3 of content.
Then it logically implicates that the law would force individuals in the development of more content so that there always below the threshold of 1/3.
However if a law explicitly would do such a thing that would be unacceptable to the first amendment, it seems however we can get around it indirectly.
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by EricDraccip.
I dont know about musk, and trump, but I could see a spat with carr, and musk that section 230 will eventually cause a problem between the two, also go bluesky!
Can’t believe we didn’t get stuck on section 230
Surprised that the judges didnt lead the conversation to talking about section 230, weve seen that happen too many times
one third should pose more 1st amendment problems
If the law requires that it will only go into effect, if there is more than 1/3 of content. Then it logically implicates that the law would force individuals in the development of more content so that there always below the threshold of 1/3. However if a law explicitly would do such a thing that would be unacceptable to the first amendment, it seems however we can get around it indirectly.