METR and Redwood both asked for a broader scope in their original list of questions, but we’re in an entirely voluntary regime
Why was the compromise of OpenAI’s own infrastructure outside the scope of the evaluation metr.org/blog/2026-08-2…- METR and Redwood both asked for a broader scope in their original list of questions, but we’re in an entirely voluntary regime
I'm honestly confused at OpenAI's reasoning here. If they're going to be this restrictive why allow an investigation at all? I suspect this was a compromise reached under internal tensions, and specifically a calculated concession from the C-suite.
