Post

Log inSign up

Post

  • user avatar
    Ed Newton-Rex
    @ednewtonrex
    Creators should not be required to opt out of gen AI training. Many creators (e.g. Squarespace users) have no meaningful way of opting out. For creators who ‘can’ opt out, there are multiple overlapping opt-out methods, which are (i) incredibly confusing and (ii) woefully incomplete in their coverage. Even if a perfect universal opt-out existed (nowhere close), it would be hugely unfair to put the opt out burden on creators, given that gen AI uses their work to compete with them - many would simply not realise they could opt out. And, of course, a lack of transparency / audit requirements means AI companies can simply ignore opt-outs:
    user avatar
    Oli Franklin-Wallis
    @olifranklin
    Jun 19, 2024
    Incredible @WIRED investigation shows Perplexity, the much-hyped, AI-powered Google search alternative funded by Bezos and others, is intentionally ripping off publishers' copyrighted work - and reveals exactly how they're doing it. wired.com/story/perplexi…
    7:56 AM · Jun 20, 202410.8KViews
  • user avatar
    neil turkewitz
    @neilturkewitz
    Jun 20, 2024
    Agree 100%, but would note that the following is only partially true: “MANY creators have no meaningful way of opting out.” Truth is—ALL creators have no meaningful way of opting out. Opt-out assumes artists can control how their works are made publicly available. A fantasy.
    user avatar
    MMitchell
    @mmitchell_ai
    Apr 10, 2024
    Rundown of some companies that allow you to "opt out" of having your data used to train AI. Thanks for the work @MattBurgess1 and Reece Rogers. wired.com/story/how-to-s…
    629

Log in or sign up for X

See what’s happening and join the conversation

Continue with phone
or
Log in with username or email

Relevant people

Avatar
Ed Newton-Rex@ednewtonrexFollow
CEO of @fairlytrained / Composer. Involuntary training data provider.

Trending now

Terms·Privacy·Cookies·Accessibility·Ads Info·© 2026 X Corp.