This answer I came across in a review is basically "You can do that with <Keyword>, see <link>".
https://stackoverflow.com/review/late-answers/36798588
Not the best answer - the link might become invalid, so a bit of the content should be included in the answer directly. Also I think, not the worst answer: The link is useful, and even if it is dead, the small text it does include mentions a helpful android concept that the question and the other answer do not.
The audit expected 'edit' or 'recommend deletion'. I can see why editing is appropriate, but deletion seems to destroy some value here. The post is now deleted. I don't have sufficient priviliges to see if it was deleted by the community or the author.
I didn't come here to complain about the audit, but I did wonder what the rules on link-only answers are. To avoid the risk of a dead link, we delete the link? This does not seem right.
I found some previous discussion of this problem here: Where do we draw the line for link-only posts? and Mass removal of link-only answers also removes internal links and What to do with almost-link-only answers? that tell me I am not the first to discuss this, but none of these clarify the rules.
meta.stackoverflowbut onmeta.stackexchange- I instead decided to answer my question by linking to the other post so this QA does not stand out as unanswered.man printfisn't really helpful and we don't have to worry about corner cases like "is there a grain of helpful info in there?" - crap is crap, just delete it. This isn't a crap museum where crappy answers must be preserved for future generations. Those who are concerned about why their crappy one-line answers are getting deleted should simply write higher quality answers.