Teacher arrested for clapping in support of opposition at an AI data center meeting — gigawatt-scale project gets approved anyway despite community resistance
Is clapping politely disruptive enough to get you arrested?
Police from Emporia, Kansas, arrested a teacher for applauding a speaker who was speaking out against a proposed zoning change to accommodate a planned data center in the area. According to 12 News, the police dragged 37-year-old Lux Claridge from the community meeting and charged him with disorderly conduct and interference with law enforcement. The commissioners had reportedly repeatedly warned against clapping and making other reactions while someone was speaking.
A video circulating on the internet shows Claridge clapping five times after a speaker closed their statement. We can hear in the clip below someone saying, “Ask him to leave,” followed by a second voice confirming, “Can I?” The voice then asked a police officer, “Chief? Will you ask-will you take the next person out that claps or anything, please? Thank you.”
The cops then approached Claridge, who said, “I have a right to speak.” The police were nonetheless insistent, which is when he said, “Drag me out.” Four officers then proceeded to cuff the teacher and hoisted him off to Lyon County Jail.
The data center’s critics warned against the project, saying that it could strain the local power supply and negatively impact the residents’ water quality. Their concerns are not without merit, as AI data centers have caused a massive 76% increase in electricity costs in the U.S.’s largest power region, while a Meta site is accused of muddying an entire town’s water supply.
Despite that, Emporia, located about 100 miles Southwest of Kansas City, approved the zoning changes needed for the Flint Hills Digital Campus project to move forward with the permitting process. This does not mean that the data center will immediately start construction, though, as it probably still needs to go through several more steps before it can break ground.
This isn’t the first time that a data center dissenter was hauled off to jail for reasonably pushing back against the said project. An Oklahoma farmer was arrested back in April for trespassing after going a few seconds over his allotted time and handing paperwork to the commissioners. Pushback against projects like these have been happening across the country, with several jurisdictions like Seattle and New York State enacting one-year moratoriums to study the potential effects of these infrastructure projects and how they could be mitigated.
President Donald Trump created the “ratepayer protection pledge” to force AI hyperscalers to “pay their own way” when it comes to electricity costs. He has even expanded this recently to include states and utility companies, with 23 governors and 187 firms signing up on the promise. Unfortunately, this is just a piece of paper and has no legal or regulatory power over the signees, with tech companies pushing back against a California bill that wants to turn this into law.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
At the moment, Oregon is the only state that has passed and enacted a law that forces electricity consumers that used 20 MW or more to cover their fair share. Because of this, Portland General Electric, the state’s biggest power generator, has increased data center bills by 30% while cutting residential electricity costs by 1.3%.
Claridge is currently out on bail and is awaiting his hearing in September. "I'm glad to be out, but this is an inconvenience, really," Claridge said to local media. "It's not really deterring me from speaking out or, I guess, clapping."
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.
-
PEnns "The voice then asked a police officer, “Chief? Will you ask-will you take the next person out that claps or anything, please? Thank you.”Reply
The cops then approached Claridge, who said, “I have a right to speak.”
Not anymore buddy!! You're not even a big corporation whose money has more right to speak than you!!
What's that? Clapping is not a form of speech?? But the US Supreme Court said even money is .....free speech! (Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010))
What was the name of that dystopian movie? No, not 1984.
Ah yes: AI and corruption in 2026. -
Kindaian He doesn't need a lawyer. He didn't opposed the removal. He just stated that he would need help by being dragged out. And the police complied.Reply -
Dr3ams ReplyThe commissioners had reportedly repeatedly warned against clapping and making other reactions while someone was speaking.
Sounds pretty simple to me. A clear warning was given...just don't clap while someone is speaking. This individual didn't just clap once, but five times. Nobody was forbidden to speak and voice their opinion when their turn came around. -
SomeoneElse23 Reply
"Dragged out" != "Arrested"Kindaian said:He doesn't need a lawyer. He didn't opposed the removal. He just stated that he would need help by being dragged out. And the police complied. -
DS426 Reply“We are citizens of this community; we have a right to do our constitutionally protected activities, which is exactly what they’re violating at this time as well,” the community member said. “I think we’re all in a state of fear because of what this government’s doing to us.” - one of the citizens at the meeting
Exactly right. A city commission's public town hall meeting isn't a courtroom and thus doesn't mandate the same level of personal conduct and decorum. The civic leaders were right in ensuring an orderly meeting and have a degree of authority and responsibility to do so, but clapping in a non-disruptive manner doesn't meet that threshold for "disorderly conduct." They obviously just didn't like it and felt they had the authority and nerve to trample Free Speech under the false pretense of "orderly conduct."
This isn't how you treat reasonable citizens that you work for as elected officials. I like what the arrested man's brother said: "This isn’t going to hold up in court. Lux is going to fight them on that. I’m looking at avenues to get these people recalled. This is insane to me."
He didn't resist being removed. It's one thing to have him removed, but to actually press charges... that's when things get really concerning: when peaceful civil disobedience is met with making an example out of someone.
I'd love to see this case work it's way up the court system. -
Blastomonas It may have been against the rules to clap, but to be arrested? A little bit too far me thinks.Reply
The US isn't what it used to be.. Thankfully I don't live there 😁 -
sadsteve Reply
He didn't clap while the speaker was talking, he clapped after the closing statement.Dr3ams said:Sounds pretty simple to me. A clear warning was given...just don't clap while someone is speaking. This individual didn't just clap once, but five times. Nobody was forbidden to speak and voice their opinion when their turn came around. -
txfeinbergs Reply
Is reading hard? He didn't clap during the speaker who he was in support of, but afterwards. Also, he didn't clap 5 separate times. He clapped his hands together 5 times at the end of the speech. Sorry, but I don't want to be in your world where clapping 5 times for someone you agree with gets you arrested. Why don't you move to Russia if that is what you prefer.Dr3ams said:Sounds pretty simple to me. A clear warning was given...just don't clap while someone is speaking. This individual didn't just clap once, but five times. Nobody was forbidden to speak and voice their opinion when their turn came around.