Sign in to view Leland’s full profile
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Sign in to view Leland’s full profile
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
San Francisco Bay Area
Sign in to view Leland’s full profile
Leland can introduce you to 10+ people at Coupang
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
7K followers
500+ connections
Sign in to view Leland’s full profile
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
View mutual connections with Leland
Leland can introduce you to 10+ people at Coupang
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
View mutual connections with Leland
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Sign in to view Leland’s full profile
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
About
Welcome back
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
New to LinkedIn? Join now
Articles by Leland
-
How To Guide: Migrate out of Replit to reduce costs by 80%
How To Guide: Migrate out of Replit to reduce costs by 80%
It was a Tuesday night in early March. I was sitting at my desk, staring at a number in the top-right corner of my…
10
1 Comment -
How to invest in out of state real estate? (article featured in MarketWatch)Feb 11, 2018
How to invest in out of state real estate? (article featured in MarketWatch)
Feature in MarketWatch and quote: https://www.marketwatch.
257
26 Comments -
How to find a job after consulting?Jan 30, 2018
How to find a job after consulting?
Thinking of leaving consulting? Are you thinking about leaving consulting and want to land a dream role where your…
80
5 Comments
Activity
7K followers
-
Leland Char shared thisSayMei got its first paid user ever today! This person was learning intermediate Chinese all the way in Africa. Reflecting back, I started this journey about six months ago, and it has taken a while to get here through many product pivots and rebrandings. This next step of market fit validation makes me more excited than ever to keep working weekends to make SayMei an amazing learning experience. The mission is still the same: help people learn Chinese when a live tutor is too expensive, and enjoying the learning journey Really excited to get back to building today! #EdTech #VoiceAI #LanguageLearning #MandarinChinese #ProductMilestones
-
Leland Char shared thisSayMei Music is live today: free, over-the-top catchy pop songs designed to help beginners learn Chinese grammar patterns. I built it because drilling grammar was never the part of Chinese learning I looked forward to. After a long day of work, “reviewing this sentence pattern one more time” for me was a pretty reliable way to start falling asleep. But I felt personally that music works differently. A melody gets stuck in your head, and the words come with it. So after listening to an interview with Suno’s CEO, I started putting two things together: what if Chinese grammar practice felt less like a memorization and more like the song you keep replaying in your head? So I launched SayMei Music with 53 HSK 1 songs, each built around a real grammar pattern learners need: saying who you are, asking questions, talking about wants and plans, asking prices, and more. I also worked hard on the product surface itself. I wanted it to feel closer to Spotify than a curriculum page: fast to browse, polished on mobile and desktop, and as intuitive to Spotify users worldwide. The early launch signal has been encouraging: - 1,000+ visitors in roughly a day - 500+ song starts - 250+ people opening study mode - average session duration around 4 minutes It is too early to call product-market fit, but this user behavior is the kind of signal I look for: people voluntarily choosing the learning format and going deeper into the engagement flow SayMei Music is completely free. I’ll put the link in the comments, please check it out! (I promise even non Chinese language learners will get the songs stuck in their heads) #MandarinChinese #LanguageLearning #EdTech #ProductManagement #AIForLearning
-
Leland Char shared thisI’m proud of the emails I get back from SayMei learners. I get one or two of these a day now, and each one reminds me why I love product management: the craft of shaping a product, the tiny details, and the chance to help real people feel more confident learning Chinese. That’s the whole reason I keep building on late nights and weekends. This screenshot is from the new testimonials section on our homepage. #ProductManagement #LanguageLearning #EdTech #VoiceAI
-
Leland Char shared thisThis morning, SayMei users replied to my founder email. Alice wrote: "I went on a little spree to find apps that would help me practice my Chinese because I have nowhere to practice my Chinese and I can feel my ability to speak Chinese slip away. Even just 15 mins of conversation in Chinese a day would help so much and SayMei is exactly what I needed." These are the kinds of emails every builder says they want. The problem is that, in practice, user emails and support emails are easy to ignore. You are building the product. Fixing bugs. Checking analytics. Improving onboarding. Watching costs. Shipping the next thing. Then a real user writes something generous or confused or specific, and the email sits in your inbox. I read it. I think about the product because of it. Then I often do not get around to responding. This time was different. I built a Codex automation around it. Every day, an agent reads my SayMei support and founder inbox through the Gmail plugin. It separates real learner replies from notifications, checkout alerts, tests, newsletters, and operational noise. Then it reads the full thread and drafts a reply in my voice. The key detail: it is not using a generic support prompt. It leverages past responses as examples, and I turned those patterns into a small SayMei support-reply skill. I review and send. Today, that meant five replies went out without a single edit after the few-shot examples were created into the skill. The same pattern is starting to show up across the rest of SayMei. Current automations are: 1) check live lesson quality every day and report back with metrics and suggestions 2) review push notification behavior and report back with metrics and suggestions 3) run safe SEO checks and directly implement improvements to dev branch 4) check Web Vitals and site speed and directly implement improvements to dev branch My website is slowly becoming self-maintaining and self-improving. It's not fully autonomous but 5% autonomous... I still want judgment, taste, new feature development, and final approval to stay with me. But the default behavior changes from: "I should remember to check that dashboard and figure out what to do." To: "An recurring agent will create the data, inspect it, make a recommendation, and tee up the next action." This is the future. #AIAgents #CustomerSupportAutomation #Codex
-
Leland Char shared thisMy parents are both in their mid-60s. Today, they were running six parallel AI agents locally through Codex. An hour earlier, they were using Gemini on fast mode in a web app and getting frustrated. The image outputs did not match what they wanted. The model misunderstood their intent. They were just stuck in the middle layer of AI adoption: curious enough to use the tools, but boxed into dumbed down models and interfaces that made AI feel less capable than it actually is. So I spent an hour with them. I set them up with the same kind of stack I use for building software: - Codex running GPT-5.5 at extra-high reasoning - Wispr Flow for dictation, so they could stop typing with two fingers - Local file access on their own machine - Gmail plugin - Browser access - ChatGPT image generation inside the workflow I explained the basics, but they did the work. They dictated the tasks. They launched the agents. They created local folders. They watched the outputs come back. Within minutes, they had agents helping with: - Reviewing their 2025 taxes and looking for optimization ideas for next year - Researching appliances and turning the findings into reports - Organizing their desktop into folders - Reviewing Gmail for missed or important emails - Planning a trip to Greece and comparing tours - Creating personal cartoon images that actually matched the prompt The funniest moment was my dad getting annoyed when the tax agent pointed out ways he could have been more optimized last year. The best moment was my mom seeing an image finally come back exactly the way she pictured it. This made me rethink the AI adoption curve. I do not think older adults need a toy version of AI. They do not need a smaller chat box that can only answer simple questions. They can use frontier models. They can use agents. They can use local context, voice input, browser tools, email tools, and the same workflows that coders are using today. The hard part is not human capability. The hard part is consumer awareness and the fact that "Codex" sounds like something made only for developers... #AIAdoption #DigitalLiteracy #HumanComputerInteraction
-
Leland Char shared thisI changed my AI coding stack again today. Again. As of 7:00 p.m. today, I was simultaneously paying for four AI tool subscriptions: - Gemini / Antigravity - Claude Max - Cursor Pro - OpenAI / Codex The monthly total was roughly $750 across $200, $250, $100, and $200 plans. That sounds ridiculous. But I have stopped thinking about this as software spend and started thinking about it as throughput. When I am building SayMei after work, the bottleneck is no longer whether one model can help me write a component. It is how many long-running tasks I can safely keep moving at once. Tonight I had four agents running in parallel for more than 30 minutes at a time: - One was doing a full code cleanup and refactor, paying down leftovers from a redesign that started months ago. - One was connecting the unfinished pieces of our flashcard system. - One was building an agentic calibration loop that adjusts to a user's level at the end of every lesson. - One was porting my MCPs, skills, and CLI workflows from Claude Code into Codex. In a few hours of post-work coding, the repo moved by over 26,000 lines and counting. That number is messy. Some is scaffolding, some is refactor churn, and some will get deleted. But the magnitude is the point. The unit of work has changed. A year ago, I thought about AI coding as "ask a model for help, then go back down into the code layer to play with parameters." Tonight felt different. I was operating more at the orchestrating large projects layer: describing work, having an agent split it across agents, checking taste, and deciding what was allowed to ship. Over the last 20 days, Gemini 3.1 Pro in Antigravity was my default because it was fast and surprisingly strong for front-end design iteration. When last Thursday Opus 4.7 and Claude Design changed the equation for long-running implementation and design-system work, I moved more of my workflow into Cursor Pro and Claude Max. Today, after seeing what the new Codex workflow could do, I cancelled an Ultra subscription, restarted my OpenAI plan, downloaded Codex, ported over my skills and MCPs, and started using it immediately. That is the part of AI tooling that still feels under-discussed. The edge is not having "the best model." The edge is building a workflow where switching models is cheap, parallel execution is normal, and your taste still decides what ships. For solo builders working on the weekends, it changes what one person can realistically build after dinner. I do not think everyone should spend $750/month on AI tools. But I do think serious builders should treat their AI stack like a living system, not a fixed preference. #DeveloperTools
-
Leland Char shared thisOpus 4.7 dropped, I checked the coding benchmarks, and by the end of the day I had completely rewired how I build SayMei. Until this week, my default coding model was Gemini 3.1 through Anti-Gravity. It is still excellent for design, but the new benchmarks made the call obvious: switch the harness, switch the model, do not stay loyal to a setup just because it has been working. Today I was dual-wielding Cursor Pro and Claude Code on the Max plan, sometimes with three Cursor agents running in parallel on top of that. My MacBook was loud enough that I could hear it from across the room. Here is the new stack: - Primary execution: Opus 4.7 in both Cursor and Claude Code - Design iteration: Claude Design The difference shows up on long, multi-step work. Earlier today Opus 4.7 ticked through a 17-step plan touching LiveKit and agent rooms in a single clean run. The same kind of task used to cost Gemini three or four shots with documentation open. That extra headroom let me ship the thing I have been wanting to do for weeks: a full rebuild of the SayMei design system from the ground up, using Claude Design. I turned it into a design skill, retired the old one, then went page by page tightening UI, copy, and responsive behavior for both mobile and desktop. The site finally feels consistent end to end. The takeaway: do not get too attached to one tool or one model. Switching the harness almost always unlocks another 30-50 percent productivity increase, and the setup that was right last month is rarely the right one this month. Attaching a shot of our new live globe section, built with Claude Design and Opus 4.7. Check out saymei.app to see the dynamic globe midway down the landing page. #DeveloperTools #Cursor #ClaudeDesign #Opus4.7
-
Leland Char shared thisThough SayMei is hemorrhaging cash I actively chose NOT to build our Stripe integration yet. Language learning apps are inherently global. At SayMei, we have users practicing spoken Mandarin across varying countries. Building proper payment infrastructure means navigating 11+ local currencies, managing heavy FX calculations, and dealing with a maze of international tax compliance. While services like Stripe Managed Payments or Lemon Squeezy exist, integrating that global infrastructure is still a significant engineering lift for a solo builder working on the weekends. So, before writing a single line of complex billing logic, I decided to test our economics with a classic smoke test. I designed a fully polished, high-fidelity checkout flow. It automatically localizes to the user’s currency and features the look and feel of native Apple Pay and Google Pay integrations. But when a user actually clicks to checkout? They get a surprise "You caught us!" modal. We thank them, don't charge a dime, and instantly reward them with 60 free minutes of voice AI practice. Meanwhile, our backend safely logs the conversion intent, the specific button they clicked, and sends me an email of the user's intent. I'm gathering empirical willingness-to-pay data without any of the legal overhead of a premature rollout. If you have connections at Stripe Managed Payments or Lemon Squeezy, I would love to talk. I’m looking for the right payments partner to help me cover the costs of using state of the art AI Voice and avatar models supported by low latency infrastructure. Any introductions would be deeply appreciated. #PaymentProcessing #SmokeTest #UserResearch #UserIntent
-
Leland Char shared thisI almost let my LLM costs spiral out of control building my AI Voice Tutor. The problem with a real-time voice agent is that token usage compounds rapidly. Every single time a user spoke, the agent was re-reading a massive 5,500-token system prompt governing its teaching rules. Multiply that by hundreds of turns, and the API billing charts started looking terrifying. I wanted to compress the foundational prompt by 60% without the AI losing its humanity and "warm teacher" personality. Enter the 'Caveman' prompting technique. Designed super recently as an open-source workflow for coding agents (@juliusbrussee), it operates on the principle of "essentialist communication." LLMs do not need polite, grammatical English. They calculate semantic relationships across tokens. By stripping away standard English and using raw pseudo-code, you maintain 100% of the meaning while forcing the model to strictly adhere to the core rules. BEFORE (Verbose English): "You are Mei Lin, a 31-year-old human teacher from Hangzhou. You have a BA from Zhejiang University. Your style is 70% structured tutor and 30% warm companion. If a student struggles, you encourage them and never autocomplete their sentences." AFTER (Caveman Pseudo-Code): [ID] MeiLin. 31yo, Hangzhou. BA(Zhejiang). [Vibe] Style: 70_tutor/30_warm. [Rules] If_Struggle: Pause 3s -> "慢慢来". NO autocomplete. The result? I slashed the orchestration footprint from 5,500 tokens down to 1,900. My hope is for the AI to adhere to the core rules even more rigidly, and over thousands of live lessons, this simple format shift translates into massive margin improvements primarily in costs. If you're building AI agents, stop writing your prompts like essays. Write them like data objects. (Link to the open-source Caveman skill in the comments!) #PromptOptimization #TokenEfficiency #GeminiLive #VoiceAIStartups
-
Leland Char liked thisLeland Char liked thisClaude has been down on and off this afternoon. It took me about 20 minutes to port over my skills, tasks, and memory to Codex. The code was already in GitHub. My memory files were either stored locally or exported from Anthropic (something I had done previously). The switch was surprisingly straightforward. What struck me wasn't that I switched—it was how quickly I stopped caring. Within minutes, the AI tool I couldn't imagine working without just hours ago had been replaced because I simply needed to keep moving. That's how brutal is this market!?
-
Leland Char liked thisLeland Char liked thisI'm hiring Data Scientists at the Staff (L6) + Senior Staff (L7) levels, for the Search team, hybrid in our Mountain View office. The roles have ownership of one area of the Search product, and work with LLMs, experimentation, customer analyses, etc. Apply directly below: https://lnkd.in/gYvXctTq
-
Leland Char liked thisLeland Char liked thisA bit late in sharing this, but truly grateful and humbled to have received the Global Tech Recruiter of the Year 2025 (USA) award. This recognition reflects the amazing teams, leaders, and candidates I’ve had the privilege to work with along the way. Recruiting is truly a team effort, and I’m thankful for every collaboration that made this possible. Looking forward to continuing to learn, grow, and build great teams ahead! 🚀
-
Leland Char liked thisLeland Char liked thisI just opened Claude, and this appeared. It seems Anthropic launched it 2 minutes ago. Nice. "We’re upgrading Claude Opus to a new version: Claude Opus 4.8. It builds on Opus 4.7 with sharper judgment, more honesty about its own progress, and the ability to work independently for longer than its predecessors. Available today for the same price. In Claude Code, you can hand off a feature, a migration, or a bug sweep and let it follow the work through while you focus on what’s next. Also launching today: - Fast mode for Opus 4.8 (research preview). Same model at roughly 2.5x the speed, now three times cheaper than before. - Dynamic workflows in Claude Code (research preview). Claude runs hundreds of parallel subagents in a single session and verifies its work before reporting back. - A new effort control on claude ai, so you can choose how much thinking Claude puts into a response. Claude Opus 4.8 is live today on claude ai, the Claude Platform, and all major cloud platforms."
-
Leland Char liked thisGive it a try! My favorite agent harness setup so farLeland Char liked thisParallel Search & Extract are now in Pi! This extension modifies Pi to favor citing web data over guessing, improving iteration with fewer wasted tokens. Install: pi install npm:@parallel-web/pi-extension More details: https://lnkd.in/gmGu88HQ
-
Leland Char liked thisLeland Char liked thisWrapping up #AAPI Heritage Month, it felt extra special to celebrate my parents turning 70 back in China with my whole family. I especially loved reconnecting with my 4 female cousins for the first time in 8 years. Three unexpected things we share and one we don’t: 1️⃣ Career first: Each of us has put career and financial independence at the top of our list, and at different points each of us has been the primary breadwinner in our family. Two of my cousins also started their own businesses, defying societal odds. 2️⃣ Marry for love, not for comfort: Each of us married a husband who is not from Sichuan, and each of us did long-distance for years because our careers came first. 3️⃣ Raising the next generation of girls: All our kids are daughters, a statistical improbability. All of us were not primary care givers, taking a ton of help from our parents and our husbands. The one thing that sets me apart: none of my cousins ever wanted to leave Sichuan. I had a wanderlust that took me through England, Canada, and the US. They built deep roots. I built wide ones. What I see in my own family this AAPI Heritage Month is not one immigrant story. It is many AAPI women, each choosing differently, while sharing the same backbone. Happy AAPI Heritage Month to every AAPI woman quietly running her career, her family, and sometimes her own company at the same time!!! We are not a monolith. We are a multitude
Experience & Education
-
SayMei
******* * **** *******
-
*******
***** ******* *******
-
*** *******
*** *** **** ** *******
-
********** ** ******** **********
****** ** ******* ****** ********* *********** undefined
-
-
********** ** ******** **********
******** ** ******* ****** ******** *********** ***** *** *****
-
View Leland’s full experience
See their title, tenure and more.
Welcome back
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
New to LinkedIn? Join now
or
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Courses
-
Algorithms - Stanford
CS 161
-
Databases - Stanford
-
-
Machine Learning - Stanford
CS 229
-
Mining Massive Datasets - Stanford
CS 246
-
Networks, Crowds, and Markets - Cornell
-
-
Python - Code Academy
-
Honors & Awards
-
L.L. Handy Award for Outstanding Academic Achievement in Chemical Engineering
Mork Department of Chemical Engineering
-
Rusch Undergraduate Engineering Honors
Viterbi School of Engineering
-
Renaissance Scholar
University of Southern California
-
Full Tuition Graduate Scholarship
University of Southern California
-
Full Tuition Undergraduate Scholarship - Trustee Scholar
University of Southern California
-
AP State Scholar
College Board
Granted to the one male and one female student in each U.S. state with the greatest number of AP Exams and then the highest average score on all AP Exams taken.
-
Academic Achievement Award
University of Southern California
-
Deans List
Viterbi School of Engineering and Marshal School of Business
Test Scores
-
GMAT
Score: 760
Top 99th percentile
Recommendations received
7 people have recommended Leland
Join now to viewView Leland’s full profile
-
See who you know in common
-
Get introduced
-
Contact Leland directly
Other similar profiles
Explore more posts
-
Sharath Keshava Narayana
Sanas • 20K followers
The 'one-person billion-dollar company' is the most dangerous lie in tech right now. Peter Steinberger's OpenAI deal proves it, and everyone's learning the wrong lesson. The headlines say "solo developer builds billion-dollar AI." Meta and OpenAI fought a bidding war. The story goes viral. And founders everywhere start believing they can code their way to a unicorn exit alone. But look at what actually happened: Steinberger bootstrapped PSPDFKit for 10+ years. Self-funded it. Built software used by Dropbox, SAP, and Apple, managed 70 people and ran an investment consortium for 4+ years. Then he timed the agent wave perfectly and created OpenClaw, hyper-personalized AI agents that went open-source viral. OpenClaw worked because it arrived at the exact intersection of his expertise and the market's readiness. Six months earlier? Too soon. Two years later? Too late. That timing only looks like luck when you ignore the decade of pattern recognition that created it. The danger isn't that the story is false. It's that it's dangerously incomplete. A generation of builders will mistake "solo hacking" for strategy when it's actually the result of years of compounding expertise hitting the market at exactly the right moment. The media loves weekend hacks. They rarely cover the decade of unglamorous work that makes "overnight success" inevitable. So stop romanticizing the lone builder myth. Ask instead: what invisible leverage made this possible? What team, what infrastructure, what years of unsexy grinding created the conditions for this moment? Because billion-dollar moments don't start with a line of code. They start years earlier, with work nobody photographs. Shawn, Anant, Monal, Marty, Saralynn, Nitesh, Ashish, Manish, Michael, Andrés
212
23 Comments -
Jonathan Buzelan
Chainalysis • 7K followers
💥 Some startups build apps. Others build the infrastructure behind engineering, finance, and AI workflows. This US lineup just raised and teams are expanding. 🇺🇸 Axiomatic_AI (Cambridge, MA) #AI Engineering systems require provable reasoning. Axiomatic AI raised $18M Seed led by Engine Ventures, with Kleiner Perkins, Big Sur Ventures, Propagator Ventures, and others, bringing total funding to $25M. Founded by Marin Soljacic, Frank Koppens, Joyce Poon, led by CEO Jake Taylor, the company builds verification infrastructure combining AI with physics-based validation for semiconductors and advanced manufacturing. ❗ Hiring: 14 openings - https://bit.ly/4bqMxeu 🇺🇸 KAST (New York, NY) #FinTech Cross-border money movement remains slow and fragmented. KAST raised $80M Series A co-led by QED Investors and Left Lane Capital, with Peak XV Partners, and others. Founded by Raagulan Pathy, James Butland, and Sam Kerrins, the platform lets users hold, send, and spend digital dollars globally through stablecoin infrastructure. ❗ Hiring: 18 openings - https://bit.ly/4cP9gTU 🇺🇸 DiligenceSquared (YC F25) (New York, NY) #FinTech Commercial due diligence remains time-consuming for investment teams. DiligenceSquared raised $5M Seed led by Relentless, with Y Combinator. Founded by Frederik Kofoed Hansen, Søren Biltoft-Knudsen, and Harshil Rastogi, the platform uses AI to automate expert interviews, analysis, and reporting for private equity firms. ❗ Hiring: 4 openings - https://bit.ly/4uDlKV5 🇺🇸 Mega (New York, NY) #MarTech Marketing execution is shifting to autonomous systems. Mega raised $11.5M Series A led by Goodwater Capital, with Andreessen Horowitz, Atreides, SignalFire, and Kearny Jackson. Founded by Robbie Schneidman and Lucas Pellan, the platform deploys AI agents that continuously optimize search rankings, ads, and websites for SMBs. ❗ Hiring: 6 openings - https://bit.ly/4uLic38 🇺🇸 Dify (Menlo Park, CA) #DevTools Agentic workflows are becoming a core layer of enterprise AI infrastructure. Dify raised $30M Series Pre-A led by HSG, with Alt-Alpha Capital, 5Y Capital, and others. Founded by Luyu Zhang, John Wang, and Junchen Yan, the open-source platform lets teams build and run AI workflows with a visual builder and production infrastructure. ❗ Hiring: 16 openings - https://bit.ly/46YyF9Y 🇺🇸 Yourco (Chicago, IL) #HRTech Connecting frontline workers remains a blind spot for many organizations. Yourco raised $6M Series A led by High Alpha. Founded by Brodie Meyer and Benjamin Meyer, the SMS platform helps companies communicate with deskless employees across 135+ languages without apps or company email. ❗ Hiring: 6 openings - https://bit.ly/4dmBF3B Funding is the milestone. Execution starts the day after. If you’re facing post-raise people decisions around hiring, people planning, and execution risk, I open limited office hours for founders and People leaders on what comes next after a raise. DM me or comment below for a 30-min slot.
3
-
Adam Farren
Canvas Medical • 6K followers
There’s a new role emerging at the intersection of product development and GTM for AI products. It’s called Applied AI Operations. Let’s break this down: 🎯 “Applied” = building solutions that solve real-world problems for our customers ✨ “AI” = using LLMs to enable these solutions to automate specific tasks within our system ⚙️ “Operations” = combining human expertise and AI capability to deploy, govern, and orchestrate AI solutions with our customer, ensuring outputs drive the right outcomes At Canvas Medical the fantastic Alexia Downs is our first Applied AI Ops hire. Here are some of the things she does with her day: - Developing a robust and repeatable process for intaking feedback from individual users and applying it to make product-level improvements in agent output that increase the safety, reliability and performance of our AI solutions - Working with Applied AI Engineers to develop an automated prioritization system where a co-pilot parses interaction data such as edits and dismissals into prioritized improvements to the codebase for engineering review. - Creating public facing documentation and walkthrough content that addresses common themes (FAQs) from customer feedback and questions - Collaborating with product development leadership to recommend and prioritize enhancements to the U/X for Applied AI solutions that can reduce friction and increase adoption - Designing a scalable framework to handle installation, trial requests, admin management for end-users (trial enablement and billing) of Applied AI solutions It’s cool stuff and at Canvas we are taking this a step further than most. AI Ops is helping our customers deploy, govern and orchestrate agents specific to their care model, in their own dedicated environments. Each customer’s single tenant EMR instance is equipped with data architecture to give agents context, and tools to enable control and governance. That means we are uniquely capable of agent coordination within the EMR runtime. Alexia’s making this happen and by this time next year I’m expecting we will add several more Applied AI Ops members to the team, each creating 10x impact in this new hybrid role.
45
10 Comments -
Vamsi Karatam
DeepFacts.io • 3K followers
🚨 Microplastics in your food/water/air are clogging arteries FASTER than cholesterol. Your blood vessels are under invisible attack. 💔🔬 New research from the University of California, Riverside indicates that everyday exposure to microplastics may directly accelerate the development of atherosclerosis, the artery-clogging process that underlies heart attacks and strokes. Using lean, low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient (LDLR-deficient) mice on a low-fat, low-cholesterol diet, researchers exposed both males and females to environmentally relevant doses of microplastics for nine weeks. Male mice showed dramatic increases in plaque buildup -63% in the aortic root and 624% in the brachiocephalic artery-while females did not exhibit significant changes. These effects occurred without weight gain or elevated cholesterol, suggesting that microplastics themselves, rather than traditional risk factors, are directly damaging blood vessels. Mechanistic analyses revealed that microplastics were taken up into arterial plaques and strongly disrupted endothelial cells, which line blood vessels and regulate inflammation and blood flow. Single-cell RNA sequencing showed activation of pro-atherogenic gene programs in endothelial cells from both mice and humans, supporting a common biological response to microplastic exposure across species. The authors argue this provides some of the strongest evidence to date that microplastics are not just markers of pollution in diseased arteries but active contributors to cardiovascular damage, particularly in males. With microplastics now ubiquitous in food, water, and air, the researchers stress the urgency of reducing exposure and further investigating sex-specific vulnerability and underlying molecular mechanisms. While we fight plastics, proRITHM delivers 24/7 cuffless BP + AI arrhythmia alerts—catch vascular risks early, from plaque to prevention. do visit to know more on www.prorithm.com References (APA style) Lin, T.-A., Pan, J., Nguyen, M., Ma, Q., Sun, L., Tang, S., Campen, M. J., Chen, H., & Zhou, C. (2025). Microplastic exposure elicits sex-specific atherosclerosis development in lean low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice. #Microplastics #Atherosclerosis #HeartDisease #CardiovascularRisk #PlasticPollution #EnvironmentalHealth #HealthTech #MedTech #RemotePatientMonitoring #proRITHM #DeepFacts #Cardiology #PreventiveHealth #AIHealthcare #DigitalHealth DeepFacts proRITHM AVS Suresh University of California, Berkeley Riverside Reserach Innovations American Heart Association World Health Organization ICMR American Heart Association Ventures Environmental International Consultants American College of Cardiology NVIDIA Healthcare Samsung Healthcare The MedTech Forum
5
-
Dasha Shunina
OpenRouter • 19K followers
He fixed a customer bug 20 minutes before his Y Combinator interview. Six rejections. Living in a closet. No revenue. Most founders optimize for optics. Conor Brennan-Burke optimized for customers. Now he’s building Hyperspell (YC F25) — AI infrastructure for a future where digital workers outnumber humans — together with his co-founder, Manu Ebert. This conversation is about obsession. And what it really takes to win. 🔗 Watch it — link in the comments. TALKS WITH DASHA
76
46 Comments -
Ritvij Gautam
Major • 7K followers
Waymo just put self-driving cars in Manhattan. Eight Jaguar I-Pace SUVs are now licensed to roam NYC under Waymo’s new permit. It is the city’s first real test of autonomous vehicles in the most chaotic traffic on earth. Here’s why it matters. Waymo has already logged 10 million+ robotaxi rides across five U.S. cities. The AV sensor market is projected to grow from $9.6B in 2025 to nearly $69B by 2031. What looked experimental a few years ago is now moving into commercialization. The real lesson is simple. Scaling is never just about the technology. You need the right environment. You need guardrails. You need trust from the people using it. Without those foundations, even the best technology stays stuck in neutral. That same principle applies in sales. Outbound is not about throwing more dials or tools at the problem. It is about building the infrastructure that lets growth happen in real-world conditions. That is what Glencoco is focused on. Giving businesses flexibility, control, and predictability so outbound can scale without breaking. Waymo shows us what it looks like when innovation meets structure. The result is momentum. Question for you: What system or process is missing in your business that would unlock the next stage of growth?
8
-
Varun Anand
Clay • 57K followers
Here's how Clay used "Reverse Demos" to find product-market fit and build a self-serve motion from scratch: When we first launched Clay on Product Hunt in February 2022, we got hundreds of signups overnight. We demo’d our product to them like we knew best: by running 30-minute presentations like college professors on Zoom. Unfortunately, few retained -- most likely because no one was actually learning during the demo. Potential customers were usually impressed when they saw me use Clay, but as soon as they tried to use it themselves, they got stuck and churned. Enter: the reverse demo. Instead of running canned demo meetings, we started emailing potential customers before meetings, asking them to come prepared with a specific data enrichment problem to solve. If they didn’t come with an idea, we’d use the first 5 minutes to come up with a personalized use case for them. Once they were in the meeting, we’d ask them to share their screen, give them a Clay signup link, and use Zoom annotations to show them exactly where to click to complete their workflow. Our goal on every reverse demo was simple: solve the customer’s stated problem within the 30 minutes -- and try to blow their minds in the process. Initially, we had to walk people through multiple calls before they had their "a-ha" moments. Through reverse demos, we were able to get it in under one call. Our goal was to build product habits: by solving any customer’s unique business problem within 30 minutes, we helped them build confidence with Clay and made it more likely for them to use the product to solve their future problems. The obvious benefit of the reverse demo was better customer conversion and retention. After 100+ reverse demos, we were getting people to “a-ha” moments within just a few minutes and most would convert after that call alone. But—much more importantly—the reverse demo helped us quickly improve Clay’s product. There’s no tighter feedback loop than getting your ideal customers on Zoom and watching them use the product for the first time. There were dozens of times that I noticed something on a reverse demo, whether bad UX, bad copy, or a bug, and asked Eric Engoron on our engineering team to ship a change the same day. Each reverse demo was a UX masterclass. That helped us go from 7 calls to convert a customer to just 1 in less than a year. Eventually this improvement gave us the confidence to remove our waitlist and launch a successful self-serve motion. This feedback loop was foundational for our growth as we navigated product-market fit and evolved our GTM motion.
349
45 Comments -
Thibaud Lemonnier
OCUS • 7K followers
Models are commoditizing. The real moat is orchestration. Here's where most companies get stuck: They think the model is the solution. "Should we use Gemini? SDXL? Train our own model?" Wrong question. Models are commoditizing fast. A new state-of-the-art model drops every two months. The value isn't in the model itself, it's in the orchestration layer. Here's what that means: 1. Build a pipeline of models each specialized on a subset of tasks. Based on a score or moderation, which model is best for this specific operation? 2. Assemble context with precision Generic inputs produce generic outputs. Conditioning must be derived from what the system detected: brand violations, composition issues, lighting defects, use case. 3. Parallelize operations Most of the time, you're running multiple models simultaneously for different tasks on the same image. Then you combine outputs intelligently. The orchestration layer is the pipeline: Analyze → Route to best model → Contextualize → Execute in parallel and/or in sequence → Combine outputs This is where the defensibility is. Anyone can access Gemini or Claude. But building the infrastructure that orchestrates them intelligently, at scale and in a seamless experience for the user? That's the moat. Stop obsessing over which model to use. Start building the layer that orchestrates them. Are you building models or orchestration? What's your approach?
6
1 Comment -
Angela Strange
Andreessen Horowitz • 32K followers
Founders often ask us: what does it really take to build a durable AI company? In enterprise AI, we’re seeing two models emerge again and again: Oil wells (systems of record) & Pipelines (automation layers). 1️⃣ Oil wells become the source of truth for data & associated workflows. We see two entry points: Rip + Replace: When legacy systems are weighed down by tech debt, buyers are motivated to take the risk to replace with new AI-native systems. hyperexponential rebuilt insurance pricing & underwriting from ingestion to submission; Valon collapsed 25+ mortgage servicing systems into one; Vesta redesigned loan origination so tasks could run in parallel. Greenfield: When no system exists, startups capture customers early and grow with them. Rillet started as the first ERP for SMB finance teams, automating manual workflows, and has since expanded into replacing incumbents like NetSuite. Oil wells take longer to drill, but once established, they create deep, durable moats. Owning the system of record unlocks workflows no one else can build and builds switching costs. 2️⃣ Pipelines (automation/orchestration layers) -- These sit on top of existing systems and automate the “glue work” humans do between them. We’ve seen two main patterns: Fragmented Systems: When many entrenched systems coexist, pipelines unify workflows without requiring rip-and-replace. FurtherAI provides agentic workflows for insurance, automating cumbersome processes (submissions, loss runs, compliance) across multiple systems. Human Middleware: When humans are the bridge between systems, pipelines digitize that work. Concourse builds AI agents for finance teams, connecting into several financial systems so teams can query and analyze without manual effort. Sola lets customers record a workflow once and turns it into a live AI agent for tasks like invoice reconciliation. Customers don’t have to choose. Enterprises will often buy both: a new system of record in one area, lightweight automations in another. But for founders, the strategies are distinct but both can be massive. What matters is not trying to do both at once, but knowing which game you’re playing to win. New post by me & Joe Schmidt IV in comments!
172
20 Comments
Explore top content on LinkedIn
Find curated posts and insights for relevant topics all in one place.
View top content